We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."With the Process Center, I can go to one place and view what all the environments are doing."
"We use the solution to develop and deliver products."
"Responsive Portal + Process Federation Server. This set of solutions offers a unified worklist to our customers."
"We are implementing the tool to triple our monthly transaction volume."
"Technical support is good. They are very responsive. It is usually me who takes more time to get back to them than they take to get back to me, which is good."
"This tool is very useful when it comes to enterprise-grade automation and governmental processes for the security aspects, performance, and reliability."
"Integration is a big plus for me."
"With the tester coach wherein you can interact with the interface while you're designing the process."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."
"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."
"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."
"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."
"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."
"Allows to use workflow for simple approvals and LazyApproval. The feature is easy to implement for mobile approval."
"The analysis reports could be much better."
"One of the things that we are looking at is cognitive learning. IBM has another product called IBM RPA, I think, which is doing some of that stuff. We would like to see more of that with respect to cognitive learning and AI put back into the process engine to help."
"IBM BPM can improve the dashboards and reports. It only has two dashboards, and reporting is very difficult to build."
"It's a bit technical, related to the instance of migrations. It's a tough thing to handle, in every new release, in every upgrade, that we have to do things in the applications or in the product. I think IBM is working on it but I know there are a lot of requests coming in from different organizations on this."
"I would like IBM to consider including AI-enabled process mining, robotic process automation, and very good OCR capabilities from the computer vision side."
"Some of the features are not enough for my business. We need to build custom user management for the many end users affected by BPM."
"When you have to integrate files for enterprise applications."
"The initial setup was complex."
"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."
"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."
"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."
"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."
"It's very tedious to manage."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"I think it was lacking a little bit in its multiple in-house processes and other processes. So there is a little bit of a gap in collaboration."
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Oracle BPM, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, SAP Signavio Process Manager and Bizagi. See our IBM BPM vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
