We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."We have used a lot of out-of-the-box reporting on the process performance metrics. We have been able to make suggested changes to staff for this role or streamlining by eliminate some activities where people were not requiring a lot of work in the first place."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The integration and design are valuable features."
"Its Analytics is the most valuable feature."
"It has reduced a lot of manual errors and processes."
"The designer feature, compared to other solutions is easy to use."
"One of the most notable things is how you can develop use cases with the customers, internal customers, but directly within. The software process model that BPM supports is really exciting in that aspect."
"Integration is a big plus for me."
"There are many features of the solution that are quite useful. For us, the most valuable aspect may be visibility."
"They don't have a mechanism to achieve processes, data sources, and data."
"It can definitely be improved in terms of performance and stability."
"Where it can be improved is Integration. I think that the direction that IBM is taking now, to have something that is much more integrated, that can be seen as one single solution, is clearly the right way."
"We have been experiencing bad performance and instability."
"I would like it more documentation during the design phase."
"Consider an admin console during deployment. I would like to migrate single instances, not the whole bunch at once."
"It needs more customization. We like to customize the screens to show more things related to our company."
"One of the things that we are looking at is cognitive learning. IBM has another product called IBM RPA, I think, which is doing some of that stuff. We would like to see more of that with respect to cognitive learning and AI put back into the process engine to help."
"The solution could improve its user interface."
Earn 20 points
IBM BPM is ranked 6th in Application Infrastructure with 105 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is ranked 25th in Application Infrastructure. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management writes "First Look – SAP NetWeaver Decision Service Management". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is most compared with Azul Zulu.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.