We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and Informatica Cloud API and App Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of IBM Business Automation Workflow is cost management."
"Its interface is well-designed and user-friendly"
"IBM has spent a lot of time on the connections between the rules engine and its other product, the core BPM platform. They've really centralized the suite as one offering now."
"The business process modeling is the most valuable feature."
"The dashboards are helpful because you can display reports directly on your screen."
"It helps develop applications very quickly. Once clients get used to it and familiar with the methodology, then they don't feel so locked in. It is able to add this element of agility to our clients' software development lifecycle. That is my favorite thing about it: You're not so locked in as you used to be when developing applications."
"It provides a solution for integration orchestration. This solution is for any organization in the banking, telecommunications, healthcare, manufacturing, and all domains and industries."
"One of the most valuable features is the way that they are adapting to the market. Initially, it was doing only workflow. Now it has started bringing all the other components like rules within the workflow and then the integration with RPA."
"The OAuth feature is the most valuable feature for authentication."
"The interface is really good."
"The interface has a great look and feel, and the functionality is so easy."
"The application integration will give you more flexibility when dealing with APIs."
"In terms of improvement, it could be less complex."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow could improve the integration."
"The development UI is sometimes a little slow."
"The UI of the solution is not good. They should work to update the solution and make it better and fresher."
"One significant challenge is the lack of accessible forums or resources to seek help or information when problems arise."
"The main improvement would be to make it easier to implement and deploy so that customers can kick it off and run quickly."
"The initial setup is actually a really complicated process."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is not a very user-friendly solution."
"The setup is complex."
"There could be a lot more application integration."
"There's no direct way to connect to Amazon APIs from Informatica Cloud."
"The pricing model is problematic."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is ranked 19th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews. IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6, while Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud API and App Integration writes " Provides data governance and offer good scalability, with a significant performance boost when moving from on-prem to the cloud". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, AWS Step Functions and IBM Case Foundation, whereas Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is most compared with Apache Airflow, Appian, Pega BPM, ARIS Cloud and Camunda. See our IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. Informatica Cloud API and App Integration report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
