We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"It has an open BPM"
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."
"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the fact it is highly configurable. We can do configurations very easily."
"The business process modeling is the most valuable feature."
"The dashboards are helpful because you can display reports directly on your screen."
"It provides a solution for integration orchestration. This solution is for any organization in the banking, telecommunications, healthcare, manufacturing, and all domains and industries."
"The most valuable feature is automation, which is quite strong and we are quite happy with it."
"It's a flexible solution."
"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."
"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."
"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."
"The integration capabilities have been very useful."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"The initial setup can be complex for business users."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"In terms of improvement, it could be less complex."
"The setup and installation process could be made easier."
"Sometimes, we feel like we are not getting the full features of the content management capabilities."
"I feel that the features are not user-friendly."
"The UI of the solution is not good. They should work to update the solution and make it better and fresher."
"The initial setup is actually a really complicated process."
"The Workflow Designer needs improvement."
"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."
"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."
"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement"
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."
"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
"The open-source version of the product is free to use."
"We're using the open-source version for now."
"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."
"Generally, the price could be better, as well as the licensing fees."
"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."
"When you compare with Laserfiche and M-Files, IBM is expensive."
"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."
"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."
Camunda Platform is a complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations, and analytics.
With a clear vision to automate any process, anywhere, Camunda is reinventing process automation for the digital enterprise. Featuring a developer-friendly, open source approach, enterprises can use Camunda Platform to breakthrough technological, organizational, and infrastructure barriers, optimize their business processes, and drive their digital transformation initiatives forward.
IBM Business Automation Workflow combines business process management and case management capabilities in one workflow solution. It integrates the capabilities of business process and case management into a single workflow offering. It unites information, process, and users to provide a 360-degree view of work to drive more successful optimized business outcomes. IBM Business Automation Workflow on Cloud provides the same capabilities that are offered in the IBM Business Automation Workflow offering, all within a ready-to-use, cloud-based environment that is hosted in IBM Cloud data centers and managed by IBM.
K2's process automation platform helps your company grow and take automation to a new level. Tackle any business problem—large or small—and create an app to solve it, without writing lines of code.
IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 12th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while K2 is ranked 11th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews. IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.4, while K2 is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Offers the ability to create a case file identification". On the other hand, the top reviewer of K2 writes "Doesn't require customized coding but lacks flexibility and can feel cumbersome". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Apache Airflow, IBM Case Foundation, ARIS BPA and Kofax TotalAgility, whereas K2 is most compared with Nintex Workflow, IBM BPM, Pega BPM, Bizagi and Apache Airflow. See our IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. K2 report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.