We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"IBM Business Automation Workflow provides a seamless streamlined collaboration within the organizations."
"The most valuable feature of IBM Business Automation Workflow is cost management."
"It's a flexible solution."
"Its interface is well-designed and user-friendly"
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the fact it is highly configurable. We can do configurations very easily."
"It is the only product that includes capture content management and a process suite, as well as rules in RPA."
"It provides a solution for integration orchestration. This solution is for any organization in the banking, telecommunications, healthcare, manufacturing, and all domains and industries."
"One of the most valuable features is the way that they are adapting to the market. Initially, it was doing only workflow. Now it has started bringing all the other components like rules within the workflow and then the integration with RPA."
"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."
"It is very easy to use."
"This tool set makes it easy to integrate current processes and increase adoption rates and usage for the tool, as well as the process changes to update it on the fly."
"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."
"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."
"I think the initial setup is fine."
"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."
"K2 is reasonably priced."
"The setup and installation process could be made easier."
"The development UI is sometimes a little slow."
"The initial setup is actually a really complicated process."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow could improve the integration."
"In terms of improvement, it could be less complex."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow can improve UI flexibility and integration. Additionally, the solutions from IBM have to provide a paperless solution, allowing for digital versions of documents."
"Integrating the solution with existing systems can be complicated and it needs careful planning and execution."
"The SCADA Systems are very sophisticated and have a hard time integrating with our older scales. The technical support in regards to the partner side needs some improvement."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."
"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."
"The solution needs more RPA and AI features."
"It's very tedious to manage."
"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."
"At times, issues arise in certain scenarios. In such cases, the versioning can become quite difficult. There may be no other way but to restart the entire process or rectify it at that point."
"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, AWS Step Functions and Pega BPM, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Nitro Pro. See our IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
