We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution reduces the time to the resolution which is essential for businesses."
"It's a flexible solution."
"The most valuable feature of IBM Business Automation Workflow is cost management."
"IBM has spent a lot of time on the connections between the rules engine and its other product, the core BPM platform. They've really centralized the suite as one offering now."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow provides a seamless streamlined collaboration within the organizations."
"The dashboards are helpful because you can display reports directly on your screen."
"The workflow of BAW's automation is handled inside of BPM, so we can see what state it is at and how things are processing through."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is useful for helping us design custom user interfaces and processes we require."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"Sometimes, we feel like we are not getting the full features of the content management capabilities."
"The main areas which need improvement are specifically around reporting and analytics."
"The UI of the solution is not good. They should work to update the solution and make it better and fresher."
"Every client is moving to the cloud. We are still a little behind with IBM, but we are catching up from my point of view."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow could improve the integration."
"I would like to see more streamlined install and provisioning; preferably containerized IBM BPM would be helpful."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow can improve UI flexibility and integration. Additionally, the solutions from IBM have to provide a paperless solution, allowing for digital versions of documents."
"The initial setup is actually a really complicated process."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, AWS Step Functions and IBM Case Foundation, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda. See our IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
