We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."IBM Business Automation Workflow is useful for helping us design custom user interfaces and processes we require."
"This is a low-code software where you can just drag and drop on the user interface. There are also a lot of quality integrations such as TMS."
"No matter what somebody's technical experience level is, the tool can start adding value immediately. Even if that is just an analyst who doesn't have any technical background, they can use some of these no quote accelerators to get things from ideation to deployment in a matter of minutes."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow provides a seamless streamlined collaboration within the organizations."
"It helps develop applications very quickly. Once clients get used to it and familiar with the methodology, then they don't feel so locked in. It is able to add this element of agility to our clients' software development lifecycle. That is my favorite thing about it: You're not so locked in as you used to be when developing applications."
"It provides a solution for integration orchestration. This solution is for any organization in the banking, telecommunications, healthcare, manufacturing, and all domains and industries."
"It has had a positive effect on decision-making in my organization. It helps us with our dispute process."
"It is the only product that includes capture content management and a process suite, as well as rules in RPA."
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"The main areas which need improvement are specifically around reporting and analytics."
"The initial setup is actually a really complicated process."
"Sometimes, we feel like we are not getting the full features of the content management capabilities."
"The UI of the solution is not good. They should work to update the solution and make it better and fresher."
"The setup and installation process could be made easier."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is not a very user-friendly solution."
"The development UI is sometimes a little slow."
"I would like to see more streamlined install and provisioning; preferably containerized IBM BPM would be helpful."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, AWS Step Functions and IBM Case Foundation, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita, Appian and Nintex Process Platform. See our IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. ProcessMaker report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
