We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It has an open BPM"
"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."
"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
"We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well."
"The content management is great."
"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."
"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."
"Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great."
"It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events."
"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."
"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"The initial setup can be complex for business users."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"Once a workflow is launched then it stays static forever, which is a problem because if there is a change in the business then you cannot change the workflow."
"There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer"
"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."
"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."
"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."
"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."
"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."
"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
"We pay for the license of this solution annually."
"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."
"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
"We're using the open-source version for now."
"The open-source version of the product is free to use."
"IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."
"This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."
"Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."
"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."
Earn 20 points
Camunda Platform is a complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations, and analytics.
With a clear vision to automate any process, anywhere, Camunda is reinventing process automation for the digital enterprise. Featuring a developer-friendly, open source approach, enterprises can use Camunda Platform to breakthrough technological, organizational, and infrastructure barriers, optimize their business processes, and drive their digital transformation initiatives forward.
IBM Case Foundation is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. IBM Case Foundation is rated 8.0, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Harness and integrate unstructured information with business processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A customizable product with good stability and scalability and reasonable price". IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow, Appian and Pega BPM, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, ARIS BPA, K2, webMethods Integration Server and BIC Platform . See our IBM Case Foundation vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.