We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare IBM Case Foundation vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Case Foundation vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
553,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It has an open BPM""The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.""Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model.""The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now.""Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design.""The most valuable feature is the scheduling.""Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible.""We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well."

More Camunda Platform Pros »

"The content management is great.""The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it.""The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well.""Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great.""It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events.""The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."

More IBM Case Foundation Pros »

"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs.""In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pros »

Cons
"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly.""The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it.""I would like to see better pricing.""The initial setup can be complex for business users.""The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages.""Lacking in forms visualization.""As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month.""Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."

More Camunda Platform Cons »

"Once a workflow is launched then it stays static forever, which is a problem because if there is a change in the business then you cannot change the workflow.""There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer""The interface needs to be more user-friendly.""We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic.""Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly.""90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."

More IBM Case Foundation Cons »

"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier.""They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition.""There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We pay for the license of this solution annually.""I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""We're using the open-source version for now.""The open-source version of the product is free to use."

More Camunda Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

"IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive.""This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license.""Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."

More IBM Case Foundation Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
553,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With… more »
Top Answer: Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with… more »
Top Answer: Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It… more »
Top Answer: Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to… more »
Top Answer: Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you… more »
Comparisons
Also Known As
Camunda BPM
Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager
Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
Learn More
Overview

Camunda Platform is a complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations, and analytics.

With a clear vision to automate any process, anywhere, Camunda is reinventing process automation for the digital enterprise. Featuring a developer-friendly, open source approach, enterprises can use Camunda Platform to breakthrough technological, organizational, and infrastructure barriers, optimize their business processes, and drive their digital transformation initiatives forward.

IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.
With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda Platform
Learn more about IBM Case Foundation
Learn more about OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Sample Customers
24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, Allianz Indonesia, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
Suncorp Group Limited
iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm22%
Comms Service Provider22%
Computer Software Company22%
Non Profit11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government9%
Insurance Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business53%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise25%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise58%
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise38%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Case Foundation vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
553,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Case Foundation is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. IBM Case Foundation is rated 8.0, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Harness and integrate unstructured information with business processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A customizable product with good stability and scalability and reasonable price". IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow, Appian and Pega BPM, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, ARIS BPA, K2, webMethods Integration Server and BIC Platform . See our IBM Case Foundation vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.