We performed a comparison between Genpact Cora SeQuence and IBM Case Foundation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting."
"It's very easy."
"It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events."
"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."
"It provides us the capability of producing business processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository."
"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."
"The solution is scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The cloud version could use more stability."
"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."
"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."
"The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications."
"Once a workflow is launched then it stays static forever, which is a problem because if there is a change in the business then you cannot change the workflow."
"The solution can be quite expensive."
"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."
"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 38th in Business Process Management (BPM) while IBM Case Foundation is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6, while IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Streamlined business process automation with user-friendly design". Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, IBM BPM, Hubble and Tungsten TotalAgility, whereas IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow. See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. IBM Case Foundation report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
