IBM Case Foundation vs SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Case Foundation and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ahmed Elwakeel
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The content management is great.""The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable.""The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well.""The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it.""Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great.""A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.""It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events.""Case Foundation provides a strong security boost."

More IBM Case Foundation Pros →

"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."

More SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM.""There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings.""We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic.""The solution can be quite expensive.""There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer""The interface needs to be more user-friendly.""The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility.""The cloud version could use more stability."

More IBM Case Foundation Cons →

"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."

More SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."
  • "This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."
  • "IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."
  • "The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either."
  • More IBM Case Foundation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.
    Top Answer:The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either. I would rate it five out of ten.
    Top Answer:There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    529
    Comparisons
    430
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    536
    Rating
    8.3
    Unranked
    In Business Process Management (BPM)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager
    NetWeaver BPM
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.
    SAP Netweaver BPM allows companies to design their process, deploy it, Identify the bottlenecks and finally optimize the process by removing these bottlenecks and hence increasing transparency, efficiency and maintainability.
    Sample Customers
    Suncorp Group Limited
    Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren, Lenovo
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government14%
    Insurance Company9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Case Foundation is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Streamlined business process automation with user-friendly design". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow and IBM BPM, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.