We performed a comparison between IBM Case Foundation and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The content management is great."
"A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting."
"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."
"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."
"The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable."
"Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great."
"Case Foundation provides a strong security boost."
"It provides us the capability of producing business processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."
"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."
"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."
"There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings."
"The cloud version could use more stability."
"Once a workflow is launched then it stays static forever, which is a problem because if there is a change in the business then you cannot change the workflow."
"There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer"
"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
IBM Case Foundation is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Streamlined business process automation with user-friendly design". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and Camunda. See our IBM Case Foundation vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
