IBM Cloud Container Registry vs JFrog Container Registry comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
63 views|49 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
JFrog Logo
5,093 views|4,823 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product is efficient and can be used for multiple environments."

More IBM Cloud Container Registry Pros →

"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system.""It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."

More JFrog Container Registry Pros →

Cons
"IBM Cloud Container Registry should improve its API management. One improvement factor could be enhancing the integration capabilities of container registries like Harbor with hyperscaler platforms. While some container registries, like Azure Container Registry and IBM Cloud Container Registry, are tightly integrated with their respective hyperscaler environments, others may lack integration options."

More IBM Cloud Container Registry Cons →

"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline.""In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."

More JFrog Container Registry Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is recommended to enterprises due to its high costs."
  • More IBM Cloud Container Registry Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The pricing is somewhat expensive compared to its competitors. We use the Pro version."
  • More JFrog Container Registry Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product is efficient and can be used for multiple environments.
    Top Answer:The product is recommended to enterprises due to its high costs.
    Top Answer:IBM Cloud Container Registry should improve its API management. One improvement factor could be enhancing the integration capabilities of container registries like Harbor with hyperscaler platforms… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog… more »
    Top Answer:One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party… more »
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 13 in Container Registry
    Views
    63
    Comparisons
    49
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    455
    Rating
    9.0
    4th
    out of 13 in Container Registry
    Views
    5,093
    Comparisons
    4,823
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    319
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Cloud Container Registry provides a multi-tenant, highly available, private image registry that is hosted and managed by IBM. You can use the registry by adding a namespace that is private to your account and then push images to your namespace. ... A tag is an identifier of an image within a repository.

    The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.

    Sample Customers
    American Airlines, UBank, Bitly, Eurobits
    Facebook, Airbus, Dell, Slack, Volvo, Netflix, Spotify, T-Systems, Mastercard
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Insurance Company5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%

    IBM Cloud Container Registry is ranked 7th in Container Registry with 1 review while JFrog Container Registry is ranked 4th in Container Registry with 2 reviews. IBM Cloud Container Registry is rated 9.0, while JFrog Container Registry is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Container Registry writes "A free solution that is beneficial for customers who cannot afford to create new containers on-premises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Container Registry writes "Acts as a central repository and comes with code scanning feature ". IBM Cloud Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, whereas JFrog Container Registry is most compared with Harbor, Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Red Hat Quay and VMware Harbor Registry.

    See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

    We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.