We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Container Registry and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."The product is efficient and can be used for multiple environments."
"In terms of features, upgradeability to the latest version of Oracle suites has been a good feature. All we have to do is just patching or an upgrade, it's pretty easy. Then, it gets regularly updated. That's what I like about it."
"The most valuable features are the manageability and the user interface."
"The most valuable part of the Oracle Cloud Platform is the ability to develop applications that help us migrate information from on-prem to the cloud."
"The feature I think should be improved is the option to rename the machines."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the high level of performance for the databases."
"Oracle Cloud Infrastructure is about as stable as the other CSPs, but Oracle Cloud is more common in Korea."
"I like the solution’s stability, performance, and fault alerts."
"The autonomous database functions are an excellent feature."
"IBM Cloud Container Registry should improve its API management. One improvement factor could be enhancing the integration capabilities of container registries like Harbor with hyperscaler platforms. While some container registries, like Azure Container Registry and IBM Cloud Container Registry, are tightly integrated with their respective hyperscaler environments, others may lack integration options."
"The scalability requires some improvement. This is one of the most important things they need to get better at."
"The Oracle Cloud platform remains complex, and despite the abundance of resources available, significant challenges can still arise during the migration process from a legacy or on-premise system. Conversely, smaller companies with less complicated systems, such as those with a two million budget, can migrate more easily."
"The product's resilience is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The functionalities could be simplified as it is a bit difficult to learn."
"The solution does not follow a retention policy while taking ad hoc backups. Since it does not follow the retention policy, we had to do the manual task to check the backups."
"It should have other workloads from other suppliers running on the solution."
"The tool should provide more options like other cloud services. Also, it should improve scalability with the free version."
"Oracle Cloud's price is very high."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Cloud Container Registry is ranked 7th in Container Registry with 1 review while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 5th in Container Registry with 91 reviews. IBM Cloud Container Registry is rated 9.0, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Container Registry writes "A free solution that is beneficial for customers who cannot afford to create new containers on-premises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". IBM Cloud Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and OpenShift.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
