Compare IBM Cloud Container Registry vs. Red Hat Quay
Views
18
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
673
Comparisons
607
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Compared 69% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
IBM Cloud Container Registry provides a multi-tenant, highly available, private image registry that is hosted and managed by IBM. You can use the registry by adding a namespace that is private to your account and then push images to your namespace. ... A tag is an identifier of an image within a repository.
Red Hat Quay is a private container registry that stores, builds, and deploys container images. It analyzes your images for security vulnerabilities, identifying potential issues that can help you mitigate security risks.
Learn more about IBM Cloud Container Registry
Learn more about Red Hat Quay
American Airlines, UBank, Bitly, Eurobits
The Asiakastieto Group, Akbank, TTTECH
No Data Available
Comms Service Provider32%
Computer Software Company30%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government5%
IBM Cloud Container Registry is ranked 9th in Container Registry while Red Hat Quay is ranked 4th in Container Registry. IBM Cloud Container Registry is rated 0.0, while Red Hat Quay is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM Cloud Container Registry is most compared with , whereas Red Hat Quay is most compared with Harbor, VMware Harbor Registry, JFrog Container Registry, Amazon ECR and Azure Container Registry.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.