We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Container Registry and Red Hat Quay based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."The product is efficient and can be used for multiple environments."
"It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for."
"IBM Cloud Container Registry should improve its API management. One improvement factor could be enhancing the integration capabilities of container registries like Harbor with hyperscaler platforms. While some container registries, like Azure Container Registry and IBM Cloud Container Registry, are tightly integrated with their respective hyperscaler environments, others may lack integration options."
"It could be more integrated with other platforms."
Earn 20 points
IBM Cloud Container Registry is ranked 7th in Container Registry with 1 review while Red Hat Quay is ranked 6th in Container Registry. IBM Cloud Container Registry is rated 9.0, while Red Hat Quay is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Container Registry writes "A free solution that is beneficial for customers who cannot afford to create new containers on-premises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Quay writes "A stable repository that is easy to use and easy to install". IBM Cloud Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, whereas Red Hat Quay is most compared with Harbor, JFrog Container Registry, Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry and VMware Harbor Registry.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
