Compare IBM Cloud Object Storage vs. NetApp StorageGRID

IBM Cloud Object Storage is ranked 9th in File and Object Storage while NetApp StorageGRID is ranked 4th in File and Object Storage with 4 reviews. IBM Cloud Object Storage is rated 0, while NetApp StorageGRID is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp StorageGRID writes "The implementation went smoothly. It is a 'setup and forget' type of appliance". IBM Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, EMC Elastic Cloud Storage and Cloudian HyperStore, whereas NetApp StorageGRID is most compared with EMC Elastic Cloud Storage, Red Hat Ceph Storage and Cloudian HyperStore.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Cloud Object Storage? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Pure Storage, SwiftStack and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: December 2019.
389,722 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Creating your own data stores, backups, or storage grids, helps eliminate all these costs of downloading all the data back after you downloaded to the cloud.Buying the solution is expensive, but it saves you money down the line when you factor in the logistics of not having to buy tapes.The licensing that the S3 service provides them from a FabricPool standpoint is more attractive than the licensing from AWS or Azure.We save money on storage costs from this solution since it allows us to have a source of revenue from customers consuming the service.While we have been able to save money on storage costs, it could be better.The price is attractive.We chose NetApp because of price and performance.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
389,722 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
9th
Views
2,786
Comparisons
1,691
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
4th
Views
2,613
Comparisons
1,731
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
677
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
CleversafeStorage GRID
Learn
IBM
NetApp
Overview

IBM Cloud Object Storage is a web-scale platform that stores unstructured data - from petabyte to exabyte - with reliability, security, availability and disaster recovery without replication.

Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media. 

Offer
Learn more about IBM Cloud Object Storage
Learn more about NetApp StorageGRID
Sample Customers
Bitly, Dreamstime, Prime ResearchASE, DARZ GmbH
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Financial Services Firm18%
Comms Service Provider15%
Manufacturing Company12%
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Pure Storage, SwiftStack and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: December 2019.
389,722 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.