Compare IBM Cloud Object Storage vs. NetApp StorageGRID

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: March 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: IBM has the most number of additional services, this is the main advantage.
Top Answer: IBM Cloud storage is not cheap, but it could be.
Top Answer: Perhaps in price and they don't have a large number of additional services.
Top Answer: Duplication, interface and the manageability is good and simple.
Top Answer: We had issues in a few areas because we couldn't do it from GUI. There is a separate tool for accessing the object and removing it and this created quite a challenge while exiting the data on… more »
Top Answer: Our primary use case for this product is to replicate our backups to cloud on StorageGRID. We are integrators and don't use the solution ourselves, we install it for our clients. I'm an IT Service… more »
Ranking
15th
Views
2,350
Comparisons
1,712
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
385
Rating
N/A
7th
Views
4,658
Comparisons
2,966
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
360
Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cleversafe
Storage GRID
Learn More
Overview

IBM Cloud Object Storage is a web-scale platform that stores unstructured data - from petabyte to exabyte - with reliability, security, availability and disaster recovery without replication.

Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media. 

Offer
Learn more about IBM Cloud Object Storage
Learn more about NetApp StorageGRID
Sample Customers
Bitly, Dreamstime, Prime Research
ASE, DARZ GmbH
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Manufacturing Company18%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government8%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Large Enterprise75%
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: March 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Cloud Object Storage is ranked 15th in File and Object Storage with 1 review while NetApp StorageGRID is ranked 7th in File and Object Storage with 1 review. IBM Cloud Object Storage is rated 0.0, while NetApp StorageGRID is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Object Storage writes "The main advantage is the additional services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp StorageGRID writes "Enables direct operations without dependency on third-party or associated tools". IBM Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Dell EMC ECS, Red Hat Ceph Storage, IBM Spectrum Scale, Scality RING8 and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, whereas NetApp StorageGRID is most compared with Dell EMC ECS, Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO, Cloudian HyperStore and Nutanix Files.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.