Compare IBM Cloud Object Storage vs. Portworx Enterprise

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, Zadara and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: July 2021.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: IBM has the most number of additional services, this is the main advantage.
Top Answer: IBM Cloud storage is not cheap, but it could be.
Top Answer: Perhaps in price and they don't have a large number of additional services.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
16th
Views
2,271
Comparisons
1,695
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
385
Rating
N/A
Views
2,179
Comparisons
1,838
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cleversafe
Learn More
Overview

IBM Cloud Object Storage is a web-scale platform that stores unstructured data - from petabyte to exabyte - with reliability, security, availability and disaster recovery without replication.

Portworx is the solution for running stateful containers in production, designed with DevOps in mind. With Portworx, users can manage any database or stateful service on any infrastructure using any container scheduler, including Kubernetes, Mesosphere DC/OS, and Docker Swarm. Portworx solves the five most common problems DevOps teams encounter when running stateful services in production: persistence, high availability, data automation, security, and support for multiple data stores and infrastructure.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Cloud Object Storage
Learn more about Portworx Enterprise
Sample Customers
Bitly, Dreamstime, Prime Research
NIO, GE Digital, DreamWorks Animation, Lufthansa, beco, NEW CONTEXT
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, Zadara and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: July 2021.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Cloud Object Storage is ranked 16th in File and Object Storage with 1 review while Portworx Enterprise is ranked 3rd in Cloud Software Defined Storage. IBM Cloud Object Storage is rated 0.0, while Portworx Enterprise is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Object Storage writes "The main advantage is the additional services". On the other hand, IBM Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Dell EMC ECS, Red Hat Ceph Storage, IBM Spectrum Scale, Scality RING8 and MinIO, whereas Portworx Enterprise is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, VMware vSAN, Nutanix Acropolis AOS and LINBIT SDS.

See our list of .

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.