Compare IBM Cloud Object Storage vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, Zadara and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: July 2021.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"IBM has the most number of additional services, this is the main advantage."

More IBM Cloud Object Storage Pros »

"The configuration of the solution and the user interface are both quite good."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Pros »

Cons
"IBM Cloud storage is not cheap, but it could be."

More IBM Cloud Object Storage Cons »

"The management features are pretty good, but they still have room for improvement."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: IBM has the most number of additional services, this is the main advantage.
Top Answer: IBM Cloud storage is not cheap, but it could be.
Top Answer: Perhaps in price and they don't have a large number of additional services.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
16th
Views
2,271
Comparisons
1,695
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
385
Rating
N/A
2nd
Views
28,020
Comparisons
22,801
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
230
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cleversafe
Ceph
Learn More
Overview

IBM Cloud Object Storage is a web-scale platform that stores unstructured data - from petabyte to exabyte - with reliability, security, availability and disaster recovery without replication.

Red Hat Ceph Storage is an enterprise open source platform that provides unified software-defined storage on standard, economical servers and disks. With block, object, and file storage combined into one platform, Red Hat Ceph Storage efficiently and automatically manages all your data.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Cloud Object Storage
Learn more about Red Hat Ceph Storage
Sample Customers
Bitly, Dreamstime, Prime Research
Dell, DreamHost
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider28%
Manufacturing Company7%
Government4%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise47%
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, Zadara and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: July 2021.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Cloud Object Storage is ranked 16th in File and Object Storage with 1 review while Red Hat Ceph Storage is ranked 2nd in File and Object Storage with 1 review. IBM Cloud Object Storage is rated 0.0, while Red Hat Ceph Storage is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Object Storage writes "The main advantage is the additional services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Ceph Storage writes "Excellent user interface, good configuration capabilities and quite stable". IBM Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Dell EMC ECS, IBM Spectrum Scale, Scality RING8, NetApp StorageGRID and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, whereas Red Hat Ceph Storage is most compared with MinIO, VMware vSAN, Portworx Enterprise, IBM Spectrum Scale and Nutanix Acropolis AOS.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors and best Cloud Software Defined Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.