Compare IBM Cloud Pak for Security vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions.""From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products.""There is a yearly license required for this solution and it is expensive."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
522,281 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I think Swimlane is a better cost. It's small and doesn't focus on only integrating with it's own products like other XSoar competitors. 
Top Answer: I cannot speak to the exact cost of the solution or how much our organization pays. However, it is my understanding that the product is extremely expensive.
Ranking
Views
205
Comparisons
123
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
10,682
Comparisons
8,432
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
447
Rating
8.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
Learn More
Overview

IBM Cloud Pak for Security is comprised of containerized software pre-integrated with Red Hat OpenShift. The platform connects to your existing security tools – and through the use of open standards – allows you to search for threat indicators across your hybrid, multicloud environment.

Demisto Enterprise delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers to optimize the entire incident life cycle while auto documenting and journaling all the evidence. More than 100+ integrations enable security orchestration workflows for incident management and other critical security operation tasks.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Cloud Pak for Security
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise29%
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Splunk, Palo Alto Networks and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: July 2021.
522,281 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Cloud Pak for Security is ranked 18th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 6 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Security is rated 0.0, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "User-friendly and robust with good technical support". IBM Cloud Pak for Security is most compared with IBM Resilient and Splunk Phantom, whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Splunk Phantom, Fortinet FortiSOAR, IBM Resilient, ServiceNow Security Operations and Siemplify.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.