We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Pak for Security and Splunk SOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Cisco, Akamai and others in Cloud and Data Center Security."The interface is good and very user-friendly."
"Technical support is helpful."
"I like the integration capabilities of Phantom. It has a lot of integrations with other products. Its searching methodologies are also good. It is also easy to understand and easy to create playbooks."
"I'm just a beginner on the solution and it's pretty easy for me to use."
"It has definitely saved a decent amount of time for our analysts so they can focus on other tasks."
"The best feature is the integration and the custom Python code that we can write. Splunk SOAR provides us with both of these capabilities, allowing us to integrate different security solutions with Splunk SOAR and take remediation actions directly on those security tools."
"The solution’s dashboard is really good and customizable. It also has a good UI."
"Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part."
"The most valuable feature is the API connector, depending on how it's formatted and who made the actual app offering for it. The REST API is my favorite component. It's very easy to use. The filters are also really valuable. Those are the two primary features but I enjoy using the rest of it."
"Lacks sufficient technical support."
"In my opinion, the focus should be on improving its simplicity, specifically the interface, and configuration."
"The scalability could be better."
"I haven't used it fully, but based on my usage, I could not find simulation tools and features. It currently lacks simulation features, which are important for me for creating a playbook. It is also very expensive for my region."
"The pricing could be a bit more reasonable. It would be great if it were feasible for smaller organizations."
"Creating playbooks using the solution’s playbook editor, for me, is very cumbersome. There have been instances where I have said to myself that I just don't want to use this editor. I might just use a code block and write my own code within it... The functionality in the playbook editor is 80 percent there, but that 20 percent is still lacking. They could make it more efficient."
"SOAR is probably the most unreliable product Splunk has and that's because most of it is content driven from what you put into it. There are certain parts of it that have a little bit of difficulty at volume too. It's always changing. There is new stuff coming out for it that's going to make it a little bit better, but it does have some drawbacks."
"What we have seen is if the workflow gets halted or if we want to halt a workflow, it cannot be resumed."
"In the beginning, we couldn't find any specific documents for every function. It wasn't easy to navigate to what we needed."
IBM Cloud Pak for Security is ranked 20th in Cloud and Data Center Security with 1 review while Splunk SOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 30 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Security is rated 0.0, while Splunk SOAR is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Security writes "Great user-friendly interface; provides many functionalities and many free applications ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk SOAR writes "Takes most of the work away, but the time they take to implement new features is a little bit of concern". IBM Cloud Pak for Security is most compared with IBM Resilient and IBM Security QRadar, whereas Splunk SOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Cortex XSIAM, ServiceNow Security Operations, Tines and Torq.
We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.