We performed a comparison between IBM Data Governance and SAP Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance."IBM Data Governance improved data analytics operations. During a company merger, we used IBM Data Governance to understand and bridge sample data between systems."
"It is robust solution."
"The new workflow engine is based on the web app rather than the Java-based approach."
"One area with room for improvement would be the ability to generate detailed quality reports. Some Python libraries provide quality scores and reports—having that capability within IBM Data Governance would be beneficial."
"SAP should come up with specialized services as per their customer's requirements."
"I would like to see harmonizing with some of the external third-party products so that it will all be within SAP."
IBM Data Governance is ranked 29th in Data Governance with 1 review while SAP Data Governance is ranked 21st in Data Governance with 2 reviews. IBM Data Governance is rated 8.0, while SAP Data Governance is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Data Governance writes "Provides a single interface to monitor and navigate data quality metrics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Data Governance writes "A robust solution that establishes rules, policies, and procedures". IBM Data Governance is most compared with Microsoft Purview, Collibra Governance and Informatica Axon, whereas SAP Data Governance is most compared with Microsoft Purview, Informatica Axon and Alation Data Catalog.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.