We performed a comparison between IBM Data Governance and SAS Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance."IBM Data Governance improved data analytics operations. During a company merger, we used IBM Data Governance to understand and bridge sample data between systems."
"It is a very professional product. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"One area with room for improvement would be the ability to generate detailed quality reports. Some Python libraries provide quality scores and reports—having that capability within IBM Data Governance would be beneficial."
"In today's time, to be competitive, the solution's price should be lowered."
IBM Data Governance is ranked 29th in Data Governance with 1 review while SAS Data Governance is ranked 15th in Data Governance with 1 review. IBM Data Governance is rated 8.0, while SAS Data Governance is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM Data Governance writes "Provides a single interface to monitor and navigate data quality metrics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Data Governance writes "An exceptionally stable and scalable product that helps businesses in the area of data integrity". IBM Data Governance is most compared with Microsoft Purview, Collibra Governance and Informatica Axon, whereas SAS Data Governance is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.