IBM SPSS Modeler vs IBM Watson Studio comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
3,192 views|2,511 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
3,410 views|2,249 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM SPSS Modeler and IBM Watson Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Science Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM SPSS Modeler vs. IBM Watson Studio Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Stability is good.""Our go live process has been slightly enhanced compared to the previous programmatic process. There is now a faster time to production from the business end.""I think it is the point and drag features that are the most valuable. You can simply click at the windows, and then pull up the functions.""In the solution, I like the virtualization of data flow since it shows what goes where, which is mostly the strength of the tool.""I think the code modeling features are the most valuable and without the need to write a code back with many different possibilities to choose from. And the second one is linked to the activity of the data preparation.""We had an IBM Guardium service contract where we used one of their resources to help us develop our prototype. It was a good experience, but they were helpful and responsive.""Some basic form of feature engineering for classification models. This really quickens the model development process.""It's very easy to use. The drag and drop feature makes it very easy when you are building and testing the streams. That's very useful."

More IBM SPSS Modeler Pros →

"The most important thing is that it's a multi-faceted solution. It's a kind of specialist, not a generalist. It can produce very specific information for the customer. It's totally different from Google or any search engine that produces generic information. It's specialty is that it's all on video.""For me, the valuable feature of the solution is the one that I used, which was Jupyter notebooks.""Technical support is great. We have had weekly teleconferences with the technical people at IBM, and they have been fantastic.""The solution is very easy to use.""It stands out for its substantial AI capabilities, offering a broad spectrum of features for crafting solutions that meet specific requirements.""It is a stable, reliable product.""IBM Watson Studio consistently automates across channels.""It is a very stable and reliable solution."

More IBM Watson Studio Pros →

Cons
"The biggest issue with the visual modeling capability is that we can't extract the SQL code under the hood.""It's not as user friendly as it could be.""C&DS will not meet our scalability needs.""​Initial setup of the software was complex, because of our own problems within the government.""The standard package (personal) is not supported for database connection.""Unstructured data is not appropriate for SPSS Modeler.""Dimension reduction should be classified separately.""Requires more development."

More IBM SPSS Modeler Cons →

"So a better user interface could be very helpful""We would like to see it more web-based with more functionality.""It's sometimes easy to get lost given the number of images the solution opens up when you click on the mouse and the amount of different tabs.""The main challenge lies in visibility and ease of use.""Watson Studio would be improved with a clearer path for the deployment of docker images.""We would like to see it less as one big, massive product, but more based on smaller services that we can then roll out to consumers.""The decision making in their decision making feature is less good than other options.""The initial setup was complex."

More IBM Watson Studio Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Having in mind all four tools from Garner’s top quadrant, the pricing of this tool is competitive and it reflects the quality that it offers."
  • "If you are in a university and the license is free then you can use the tool without any charges, which is good."
  • "It is a huge increase to time savings."
  • "The scalability was kind of limited by our ability to get other people licenses, and that was usually more of a financial constraint. It's expensive, but it's a good tool."
  • "When you are close to end of quarter, IBM and its partners can get you 60% to 70% discounts, so literally wait for the last day of the quarter for the best prices. You may feel like you are getting robbed if you can't receive a good discount."
  • "It got us a good amount of money with quick and efficient modeling."
  • "$5,000 annually."
  • "This tool, being an IBM product, is pretty expensive."
  • More IBM SPSS Modeler Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Watson Studio's pricing is reasonable for what you get."
  • "IBM Watson Studio is a reasonably priced product"
  • "IBM Watson Studio is an expensive solution."
  • "The pricing is generally reasonable and straightforward but can vary significantly depending on the specific workloads in use."
  • More IBM Watson Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Compared to other tools, the product works much easier to analyze data without coding.
    Top Answer:The platform's cloud version needs improvements. The process to access workflow could be user-friendly. It could be easier to log in and manage security levels. Additionally, it needs to be more… more »
    Top Answer:From an improvement perspective, I would say that if the deployment environment and IBM Watson Studio's environment are separated, then it would be good. I would like them to be one and offer users a… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    3,192
    Comparisons
    2,511
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    372
    Rating
    7.3
    11th
    Views
    3,410
    Comparisons
    2,249
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    426
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SPSS Modeler
    Watson Studio, IBM Data Science Experience, Data Science Experience, DSx
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    IBM SPSS Modeler is an extensive predictive analytics platform that is designed to bring predictive intelligence to decisions made by individuals, groups, systems and the enterprise. By providing a range of advanced algorithms and techniques that include text analytics, entity analytics, decision management and optimization, SPSS Modeler can help you consistently make the right decisions from the desktop or within operational systems.

    Buy
    https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-modeler/pricing
     
    Sign up for the trial
    https://www.ibm.com/account/reg/us-en/signup?formid=urx-19947


    IBM Watson Studio provides tools for data scientists, application developers and subject matter experts to collaboratively and easily work with data to build and train models at scale. It gives you the flexibility to build models where your data resides and deploy anywhere in a hybrid environment so you can operationalize data science faster.

    Sample Customers
    Reisebªro Idealtours GmbH, MedeAnalytics, Afni, Israel Electric Corporation, Nedbank Ltd., DigitalGlobe, Vodafone Hungary, Aegon Hungary, Bureau Veritas, Brammer Group, Florida Department of Juvenile Justice, InSites Consulting, Fortis Turkey
    GroupM, Accenture, Fifth Third Bank
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    University23%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization16%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company9%
    University8%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company22%
    Insurance Company11%
    Marketing Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Educational Organization7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business71%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM SPSS Modeler vs. IBM Watson Studio
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM SPSS Modeler vs. IBM Watson Studio and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM SPSS Modeler is ranked 12th in Data Science Platforms with 38 reviews while IBM Watson Studio is ranked 11th in Data Science Platforms with 13 reviews. IBM SPSS Modeler is rated 8.0, while IBM Watson Studio is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM SPSS Modeler writes "Easy to use, quick to learn, and offers many ways to analyze data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Watson Studio writes "A highly robust and well-documented platform that simplifies the complex world of AI". IBM SPSS Modeler is most compared with KNIME, Microsoft Power BI, RapidMiner, IBM SPSS Statistics and Databricks, whereas IBM Watson Studio is most compared with Databricks, Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, Azure OpenAI, Google Vertex AI and Anaconda. See our IBM SPSS Modeler vs. IBM Watson Studio report.

    See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.