Compare IBM DataPower Gateway vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: August 2020.
437,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
437,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:  First, we should not compare data power and Apigee. Both meant for different purpose. Generally, DataPower used for authentication most of uses cases, where Apigee enable digital technologies. In… more »
Top Answer: The API Connect gateway service and the SQL injection feature is good.
Top Answer: If you want additional features, you will need to pay more.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
5,218
Comparisons
4,352
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
471
Avg. Rating
7.3
Views
66
Comparisons
32
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
WebSphere DataPower, IBM DataPower, IBM WebSphere DataPowerActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework
Learn
IBM
TIBCO
Overview

IBM DataPower Gateway is a single multi-channel gateway that helps provide security, control, integration and optimized access to a full range of mobile, web, application programming interface (API), service-oriented architecture (SOA), B2B and cloud workloads. It enables you to rapidly expand the scope of valuable IT assets to new channels - giving customers, employees and partners access to critical resources. It is available in the following form factors: physical, virtual, cloud, Linux and Docker.

The TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance product does not come with any user licenses. Customers will need to purchase either named user licenses, concurrent user licenses, or any mixture of the two as outlined below. Requires the customer to have a valid license for either the production or developer versions of the TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance product. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework provides design-time governance that includes everything required for service lifecycle management. Included in the platform are an SOA registry, metadata repository for service artifacts, service lifecycle management tools, service contract management, and design-time policy/validation management. The product also comes with a plug-in that allows Visual Studio or Eclipse developers to interact directly with registry or repository from their IDE.
Offer
Learn more about IBM DataPower Gateway
Learn more about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework
Sample Customers
RBL Bank, AvailityArbeitsmarktservice, Hangzhou Municipal Government, Harlow District Council, Social Security Administration, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Insurance Company10%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company7%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: August 2020.
437,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM DataPower Gateway is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework is ranked 34th in Application Infrastructure. IBM DataPower Gateway is rated 7.4, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM DataPower Gateway writes "Deals with multiple protocols, but "WTX" components are problematic". On the other hand, IBM DataPower Gateway is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB, Apigee, NGINX Plus and webMethods Integration Server, whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.