We performed a comparison between IBM eDiscovery Manager and Logikcull based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery."Creating and running queries on the solution is very good."
"Uploading the documents is super easy. You just throw it in a zip, and unless it's a PST, then you can throw it in directly."
"The most valuable feature which I found was that it was very user-friendly. It's a very new age-friendly tech for uploading the data into the software. It also has a wonderful representation of data in terms of dashboards and pivot charts where you get your data represented in various angles and projections."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"It would be better if they could include a technology-assisted review feature, which brings artificial intelligence into the cloud and the system itself. It would be great savings in terms of time and costs as you won't have a person manually going into a dense asset of documents and doing it."
"The guys over at Logikcull will do everything possible to avoid a screen-share — they do everything via text."
IBM eDiscovery Manager is ranked 25th in eDiscovery while Logikcull is ranked 14th in eDiscovery. IBM eDiscovery Manager is rated 9.0, while Logikcull is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM eDiscovery Manager writes "Stable with administrative aspects and an easy to navigate backend". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Logikcull writes "Powerfully simple legal software for processing, reviewing, and producing data". IBM eDiscovery Manager is most compared with , whereas Logikcull is most compared with Microsoft Purview eDiscovery and Casepoint.
See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
