IBM eDiscovery Manager vs Smarsh eDiscovery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
119 views|57 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Smarsh Logo
172 views|120 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM eDiscovery Manager and Smarsh eDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ivan Castaneda
Use Smarsh eDiscovery?
Ranking
25th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
119
Comparisons
57
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
19th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
172
Comparisons
120
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
eDiscovery Manager
Micro Focus eDiscovery, Autonomy eDiscovery, HPE Autonomy eDiscovery, HPE eDiscovery
Learn More
Overview
IBM eDiscovery Manager enables authorized IT and legal staff to search, cull, hold and export case-relevant content to manage electronically stored information (ESI). eDiscovery Manager helps you respond to discovery requests and Streamlines and standardizes the electronic discovery process. It Preserves the electronically stored information (ESI) evidence in a security-rich, auditable, high-scale, trusted evidence repository that includes chain-of-custody tracking and Enhances your capacity to organize ESI, email and other content to reduce discovery costs and risks.

eDiscovery is a comprehensive, end-to-end eDiscovery platform that Operates. It Combines powerful analytical tools with core strengths in understanding human information, it presents a choice of document review options to match the right workflow to each unique matter and can be combined with other offerings. Discovery delivers broad coverage across data repositories and myriad data types, and is language independent to give you the fastest, most-complete solution on the market. eDiscovery helps corporations, law firms, and government entities prepare for, and react to, legal matters involving large amounts of data - without bias to repository or location. A pioneer in legal holds, early case assessment, and Technology-Assisted Review, eDiscovery helps you solve the full breadth of discovery and investigations challenges, from data collection through production. It covers the full spectrum of requirements, including Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), information management, preservation, processing, early case assessment (ECA), review and analysis, and production, allowing you to avoid the risk and cost of switching tools or vendors at different stages of discovery. eDiscovery is underpinned by our IDOL technology, which provides access to hundreds of data types and reaches across myriad data silos throughout the enterprise, this patented software also helps you understand human-generated (unstructured) information and administer data in place.

Sample Customers
Hansgrohe
Bank AlJazira, MTS India, Vodafone Ireland
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM eDiscovery Manager is ranked 25th in eDiscovery while Smarsh eDiscovery is ranked 19th in eDiscovery. IBM eDiscovery Manager is rated 9.0, while Smarsh eDiscovery is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM eDiscovery Manager writes "Stable with administrative aspects and an easy to navigate backend". On the other hand, IBM eDiscovery Manager is most compared with , whereas Smarsh eDiscovery is most compared with Microsoft Purview eDiscovery.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.