Compare IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Jira

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Jira and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
442,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"All of the features work together to provide a powerful holistic solution - from the dashboard all the way through to security.""Work distribution among team members and accountability for completion with a clearer picture."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pros »

"Some of the features that are most important to me of JIRA Agile are the sprint planning, being able to write user stories and being able to use task management.""It has an easy UI that can easily plug-in to every level.""This tool can be used anywhere and on any device.""The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the configuration, being able to configure it to suit your own needs.""The features that we find most valuable are the Workflow, Scrum workflow, and Dashboards.""The most valuable feature is the full integration between Work management, Source code management, and Test Automation.""The most valuable features are the customized Dashboard, Sprint Planning, and Automatic Notifications.""The most valuable feature is the Burndown Chart to see work that is outstanding."

More Jira Pros »

Cons
"Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified.""Teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards along with plans."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Cons »

"I have had problems with performance and unresponsiveness. All of a sudden, the performance slowed down, and I had a number of users that could not use the tool.""The CACD solutions on JIRA has some plugins, but they are not easily understandable or workable.""The user interface and views on different devices should be improved.""The plugin management needs a lot of work.""It would be very useful to have drag and drop time tracking.""The hierarchy for Jira tickets is too flat.""This solution would be improved with the inclusion of integration with SVN, and auto-sync with the build release number.""The reporting needs to be improved."

More Jira Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition.""It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We feel that the product is a good value for the cost.""Licensing is on a monthly basis, and it is based on what you use.""To try this solution, use their cloud offering to get familiar. After that, it's in my view worth the money.""I don't feel that price is an issue."

More Jira Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
442,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Glad to see your post!! In the recent Microfocus version does Microfocus one UFT integration possible with Jira. If so How it is possible and how effective it is?
Top Answer: Issue linking has enabled teams to trace issues.
Top Answer: The only thing that JIRA doesn't for us is release management in a way that I can create a list of versions easily.
Ranking
Views
3,789
Comparisons
2,706
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
519
Avg. Rating
7.0
Views
71,485
Comparisons
62,390
Reviews
36
Average Words per Review
348
Avg. Rating
8.3
Popular Comparisons
Compared 46% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Also Known As
IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTCJira Software
Learn
IBM
Atlassian
Overview

IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

JIRA has multiple deployment options to provide the flexibility your organization needs.

Cloud is a fully hosted service for customers who want to iterate quickly and have us take care of managing the infrastructure.

For customers who need to run our applications behind their firewall, we have Server and Data Center options. Server delivers greater capacity for a larger user base and gives you more control, allowing you to remain compliant with your enterprise IT, security, IP and privacy policies. For our largest customers, Data Center provides all the capability of our Server option, along with high availability, instant scalability and performance at scale.

Atlassian also offers premium support and strategic services for enterprise customers. Technical Account Managers are cross-functional technical advisors providing proactive planning and strategic guidance across your organization. Premier Support goes above and beyond our standard offerings to give you account-wide support from a team of senior support engineers.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Learn more about Jira
Sample Customers
Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS ITSquare, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company10%
Government8%
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company15%
Financial Services Firm15%
Computer Software Company13%
Manufacturing Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company6%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise50%
REVIEWERS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise80%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Jira and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
442,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is ranked 10th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 2 reviews while Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 36 reviews. IBM Engineering Workflow Management is rated 7.0, while Jira is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM Engineering Workflow Management writes "Gives us work distribution among team members, but teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jira writes "Good UI, easy to trace tickets, and very stable". IBM Engineering Workflow Management is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, CA Endevor Software Change Manager, Rally Software, TFS and CA Harvest Software Change Manager, whereas Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, TFS, Micro Focus ALM Octane, Rally Software and PTC Integrity. See our IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Jira report.

See our list of .

We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.