Most Helpful Review
Gives us work distribution among team members, but teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and...
Use PTC Integrity? Share your opinion.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Work distribution among team members and accountability for completion with a clearer picture.
All of the features work together to provide a powerful holistic solution - from the dashboard all the way through to security.
Agile templates give us a standard methodology for every Agile project. Also, the ability to create our own object types and linkages to features/epics allows us to enhance the verification of feature readiness.
We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client.
We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information.
Teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards along with plans.
Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified.
It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer.
To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition.
It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements.
Information Not Available
out of 18 in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
Average Words per Review
out of 35 in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Average Words per Review
Compared 53% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
|IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC||MKS|
IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.
|The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.|
Learn more about IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Learn more about PTC Integrity
|Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT||TRW Automotive|
Comms Service Provider11%
Software R&D Company11%
No Data Available