Compare IBM FileNet vs. Saperion

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM FileNet Logo
12,457 views|6,235 comparisons
Saperion Logo
518 views|368 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Saperion? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: November 2020.
448,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"1. It will be more expensive than estimated to setup. 2. You will need to double the staff while you are running the old system and installing the new system. 3. Depending on the number of documents to be migrated, make sure you understand the potentially massive amount of time and effort required to migrate the existing content to the new platform.""The physical space that we have gained back pays for the service. Therefore, it has reduced our operating costs overall. We have definitely seen ROI. I would estimate $30,000 a year.""Talking about the cost is difficult because IBM has offers that combine different products, and each of these offers has different types of licensing. IBM also has a policy that the actual price for a given customer may be very different from the stated book price. It's hard to say whether it's expensive or not.""My customers have seen ROI. There have been productivity gains, time savings gains, and things that they have been doing much more efficiently in a more modern way than they were before.""It has reduced operating costs by reducing the amount of manual work needed.""We use extraction. Therefore, we can see 80 to 85 percent accuracy on data extraction. This reduces the manual indexing part, which is definitely a gain on performance efficiency.""The solution saves time and money. It helps us to be able to accomplish the goals of our business, as opposed to being tangled in the weeds of what we could do.""Yearly, we pay for the maintenance, which is $20,000."

More IBM FileNet Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
448,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: If you are comparing the products, then it's important to look into your requirements outside the product. From the comparison point of view, we have worked with EverTeam which is SharePoint based… more »
Top Answer: I like the security and also the configuration. It is easy to configure and most of our business use cases have everything just with the configuration itself.
Top Answer: Developers like us have an upgraded interface. That interface does not work in the process that we have today. It hangs and is not user-friendly.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
12,457
Comparisons
6,235
Reviews
31
Average Words per Review
773
Avg. Rating
8.3
Views
518
Comparisons
368
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
Hyland Saperion, Hyland Saperion ECM, Saperion ECM
Learn
IBM
Hyland
Overview

IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.

There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.

The Saperion Enterprise Content Management platform not only provides immediate access to documents, it also allows them to be managed safely throughout their life cycle. This enables businesses to increase their efficiency and meet compliance requirements faster.

Offer
Learn more about IBM FileNet
Learn more about Saperion
Sample Customers
Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions. CSL Behring
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm34%
Insurance Company17%
Healthcare Company11%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider16%
Insurance Company7%
Financial Services Firm7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise65%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: November 2020.
448,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM FileNet is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 31 reviews while Saperion is ranked 20th in Enterprise Content Management. IBM FileNet is rated 8.2, while Saperion is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "Easy to integrate, and enables our clients to guarantee compliance". On the other hand, IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, IBM ECM, OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Documentum and Alfresco, whereas Saperion is most compared with Hyland OnBase, OpenText Content Suite Platform and SharePoint.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.