We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"From the perspective of analysis and prevention, this product is pretty accurate."
"Ease of deployment is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are the reporting and data-level access control."
"he solution offers trouble-free access."
"One of the most valuable features is the accelerator. It has a predefined report for PCI SOX compliance and other compliances."
"IBM Guardium Data Protection has better integration options than most of the leading competitors on the market, and the price is always better."
"The product has proven to be flexible"
"Has a great Big Data Intelligence feature."
"This solution delivers the value that it is supposed to deliver."
"Sometimes the connectors to the databases need to be manually updated and we have to configure them again, which is something that should be improved."
"Flexibility could be improved."
"The price of this solution is quite high for smaller organizations, so they should release a version that is affordable for small and medium-sized businesses."
"The technical support is very poor."
"The most important requirements for us are integration with new database solutions and the ability to manage things like Jailbreak or something like that. Its reduction feature can also be improved. It has a functionality called reduction, which is like masking data, but it is just a replacement of characters. Sometimes the customer needs more than this. It would be good if it was more advanced or complete. We also have a problem with this solution because the IBM aggregator isn't working very well. IBM has created big data intelligence for Guardium, and occasionally, customers need three or four months of data, but they can't run it from the collectors. It can have a better dashboard and more pre-defined use cases for those customers who don't have any idea about data protection or don't have expert personnel in this area. For example, they can include five use cases for banks and five use cases for retail."
"Guardium Data Protection is far better in terms of external integration. But in terms of firewall features, like when you're blocking activities, it's as if Oracle AVDF simply has superior features. This is just from third-party observations, but the users of Oracle AVDF are saying that when it comes to the firewall and protection functionality, they're much more inclined to AVDF."
"The installation should be a bit easier."
"Could be more user friendly; deployment is a little complex."
"There are not a lot of templates available to use, so we had to start many things from scratch."
"Its cost is good. With the new metric of licensing, such as PDO not being available now, customers are expecting a good price for the solution."
"For IBM Guardium, licensing is very simple and straightforward. There are no issues I can speak of."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
Earn 20 points
The IBM Security Guardium portfolio empowers organizations to grow their business and prove compliance with smarter data protection capabilities. It provides complete visibility, actionable insights, real time controls and automated compliance workflows throughout the entire data protection journey, to support your most critical data protection needs.
IBM Security Guardium delivers discovery & classification, vulnerability & risk assessments, real-time monitoring & alerting, encryption, advanced analytics and compliance reporting across structured, unstructured, and semi-structured data in on-prem (including mainframe), cloud, and across hybrid cloud environments.
Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting extracts entire copies or subsets of application data from the database, and masks sensitive data so that the data can be safely shared with test, development, and partners.
IBM Guardium Data Protection is ranked 1st in Data Masking with 9 reviews while Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is ranked 7th in Data Masking with 1 review. IBM Guardium Data Protection is rated 8.4, while Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Guardium Data Protection writes "Better integration options than competitors, with affordable licensing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting writes "Stable with good support but the single-sign on could be improved". IBM Guardium Data Protection is most compared with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, Oracle Audit Vault, Vormetric Application Crypto Suite and jSonar, whereas Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is most compared with Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data.
See our list of best Data Masking vendors.
We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.