We performed a comparison between IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Imperva, Oracle and others in Database Security."Good data encryption and data masking features."
"I think IMB's technical support is good."
"It tests security to support SOX compliance."
"Provides a unified key management system to help simplify encryption key management."
"Easy to set up data activity monitoring solution that provides competent technical support. Scalable, stable, and has good performance."
"We have integrated IBM Guardium with IBM Watson Curator. They access Curator to identify and correlate other actions the user is doing to determine if this is a legitimate action or not."
"Being an IBM product it really offers security integration capabilities and robust features. Over the years, it has satisfactory met the requirements of our customers which makes it a very reliable and versatile solution."
"It supports our audit compliance."
"This solution delivers the value that it is supposed to deliver."
"Using the data in native Guardium is difficult, at best."
"I would like them to support cloud services."
"The backup and recovery is very resource-hungry and requires a huge amount of storage capacity."
"IBM should add more database security features to Guardium. They could add user profiling, anomaly detection, and machine learning. IBM has user profiling, but they need to strengthen it. It should make sense for the users. It should remove most of the false positives."
"Initially it did not have support external applications like, say, Tableau, ServiceNow, Remedy, and the like. They have started growing into it, but I would like to have more and more integration with outside applications."
"Flexibility could be improved."
"I'd like to see a smoother GUI interface for the CAS agent - CAS does configurations on the database - to interface better with the vulnerability assessments."
"Sometimes the performance is not good, and also sometimes we have sudden bugs causing difficulties."
"There are not a lot of templates available to use, so we had to start many things from scratch."
More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is ranked 1st in Database Security with 70 reviews while Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is ranked 14th in Data Masking. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is rated 8.2, while Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security Guardium Data Protection writes "Provides visibility, has a single console that shows all information, and collector-aggregator capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting writes "Stable with good support but the single-sign on could be improved". IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is most compared with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, Oracle Audit Vault, Oracle Advanced Security, DataSunrise Database Security and Voltage SecureData Enterprise, whereas Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is most compared with Oracle Advanced Security.
We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
