IBM IMS vs InterSystems Caché comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
100 views|96 comparisons
InterSystems Logo
150 views|64 comparisons
Ranking
7th
Views
100
Comparisons
96
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
9th
Views
150
Comparisons
64
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
IMS
InterSystems Cache
Learn More
Overview
Off-the-shelf warehouse management solution designed to help automate and streamline facility operations.
Post-relational database for e-applications; delivers breakthrough performance for highly scalable Web applications.
Sample Customers
Nice Céte d'Azur, Ultra Petroleum, Hudson River HealthCare, SRG Global, The Poseidon Project, The City of Edinburgh Council, PotashCorp, ANZ, OTTO, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, NASCO, Apria Healthcare, Folksam
CysNET, Paltac Corporation, WS trends, PCS, Eventsforce, Ontario Systems, TD Ameritrade, MFS Investment Management, Assurenet, European Space Agency (ESA)
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Government13%
Manufacturing Company7%
Computer Software Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization67%
Healthcare Company15%
Computer Software Company7%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company3%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise76%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise66%
Large Enterprise28%

IBM IMS is ranked 7th in Non-Relational Databases while InterSystems Caché is ranked 9th in Non-Relational Databases. IBM IMS is rated 0.0, while InterSystems Caché is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM IMS is most compared with CA IDMS and Adabas, whereas InterSystems Caché is most compared with .

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.