IBM IMS vs Matisse comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
100 views|96 comparisons
Matisse Logo
67 views|50 comparisons
Ranking
7th
Views
100
Comparisons
96
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
12th
Views
67
Comparisons
50
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
IMS
Learn More
Matisse
Video Not Available
Overview
Off-the-shelf warehouse management solution designed to help automate and streamline facility operations.
The database for Web Services. Includes Native Object and XML Support, ANSI SQL Support, no Object-Relational mapping.
Sample Customers
Nice Céte d'Azur, Ultra Petroleum, Hudson River HealthCare, SRG Global, The Poseidon Project, The City of Edinburgh Council, PotashCorp, ANZ, OTTO, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, NASCO, Apria Healthcare, Folksam
ABB, Airbus, AMP, Areva / Cogema, Baan, Bayer, Cap Gemini Ernest & Young, CEA Technology, Deutsche Bank, Dunn & Bradstreet, Ericsson, Fujitsu, Hitachi, IBM Netherlands, NEC, Nokia, Panasonic, Pfizer, Philips, Sanofi, Saudi Aramco, Siemens, Sony Electronics, Tokyo Gas, Tokyo Hospital, Thales Group, UBS Warburg, Unilever Reasearch, University of Gronigen, Vivendi Universal
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm20%
Government14%
Manufacturing Company8%
Computer Software Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise75%
No Data Available

IBM IMS is ranked 7th in Non-Relational Databases while Matisse is ranked 12th in Non-Relational Databases. IBM IMS is rated 0.0, while Matisse is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM IMS is most compared with CA IDMS and Adabas, whereas Matisse is most compared with Actian NoSQL Object Database.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.