We performed a comparison between IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] and QueryIO based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop."InfoSphere Streams was the one core product from the platform in which we were using. We were building a real-time response system and we built it on InfoSphere Streams."
"Anyone who has even a little bit of knowledge of the solution can begin to create things. You don't have to be technical to use the solution."
"The UI was not interactive: Responses used to be very slow and hang up at times."
"There needs to be some simplification of the user interface."
IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Hadoop while QueryIO is ranked 16th in Hadoop. IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] is rated 7.6, while QueryIO is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] writes "The BIQSQL implementation is fully SQL ANSI compliant, but I have found a lot of issues in Fluid Query". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QueryIO writes "Stable with good connectivity and good integration capabilities". IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] is most compared with , whereas QueryIO is most compared with Splice Machine.
See our list of best Hadoop vendors.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
