Todd RobinsonData Analytics Architect at Covenant Technology Partners LLC
Claudio FreireChief Enterprise Architect at a non-profit
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This solution is extremely flexible and scalable."
"The integration with different technologies is the most valuable feature."
"This solution has a well-known procedure for troubleshooting and tuning the performance, providing for smooth operation."
"This solution provides us with real-time replication and it does not affect the performance of other operations, which is very important to us."
"When we are replicating data between similar databases then it is straightforward."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It doesn't take too much time or effort to implement the solution."
"This is a powerful solution provided by one of the most respected companies in the computer industry."
"The most valuable feature is data replication capability."
"The CDC feature is interesting."
"They've recently improved the ease of implementation."
"This solution would benefit from the engine being made more lightweight."
"Their technical support needs improvement."
"Additional performance metrics should be added and visible in a dashboard, displayed in a detailed manner."
"I find the user interface to be difficult for non-technical people."
"The process of transforming the data between two different databases is inefficient and needs to be improved."
"The solution, in general, should be easier to use, with less need to perform workarounds within the system."
"Technical support for Oracle products needs to be more efficient (at least locally in Egypt)."
"It should be easier to integrate this solution with non-Oracle databases, including cloud-based solutions hosted on Azure."
"We struggle with memory. It's limited. However, it may be because of our unique business case and how we use it that it's limiting for us."
"The solution is quite costly, and if they could reduce their pricing, it would be more economical to implement."
"The licensing model should be improved to be more cost-effective for the end users."
"We do like the price of this solution."
"Pricing is based on anual licensing with additional costs for support packages."
"The price of this solution is good."
"We have an enterprise license for it. It might be for three years or so. I'm not aware of any additional costs to the standard licensing fee."
Earn 20 points
IBM InfoSphere Information Server is ranked 32nd in Data Integration Tools with 2 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 8th in Data Integration Tools with 10 reviews. IBM InfoSphere Information Server is rated 8.0, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere Information Server writes "Improves efficiency through significant time reductions in ETL tasks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Powerful solution that centralizes our data and has a user-friendly interface ". IBM InfoSphere Information Server is most compared with IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Qlik Replicate, IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog, Palantir Gotham and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex and Informatica PowerExchange. See our IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Oracle GoldenGate report.
We monitor all Data Integration Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.