IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy vs iScramble comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy and iScramble based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Masking Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
HansMiseur
Use iScramble?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy's pricing is not expensive. It was less than what we expected. The licensing model for IBM Optim involves a one-time purchase followed by an annual subscription fee. This fee covers ongoing support and access to new versions. However, there are no options for extended or additional support."
  • More IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Masking solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product is very stable and flexible. The product masks data throughout the entire structure. It helps us to work in a differential integrity environment. We conducted testing directly on our… more »
    Top Answer:IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy's pricing is not expensive. It was less than what we expected. The licensing model for IBM Optim involves a one-time purchase followed by an annual subscription fee… more »
    Top Answer:We have encountered challenges with different intgrity structures. In my experience, I’ve encountered challenges with implementing business cases. While the product remains stable, translating its use… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    9th
    out of 31 in Data Masking
    Views
    139
    Comparisons
    98
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    514
    Rating
    8.0
    19th
    out of 31 in Data Masking
    Views
    61
    Comparisons
    35
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Optim Data Privacy, Optim Data Privacy
    Learn More
    Mentis
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Optim Data Privacy supports Format Preserving Encryption (FPE) and is based on the Advanced Encryption Standard 256-bit (AES-256) algorithm providing the capability to produce unique masked values that are extremely varied and without a discernible pattern.

    iScramble is the MENTIS suite’s solution for static data masking. iScramble allows you to apply a variety of masking methods to your data while maintaining referential integrity.

    Sample Customers
    Rabobank
    Static and Dynamic Masking in a Canadian Aviation Company, Discovery and masking for a large credit rating agency
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Masking
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy is ranked 9th in Data Masking with 1 review while iScramble is ranked 19th in Data Masking. IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy is rated 8.0, while iScramble is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy writes "A stable and flexible product that improves development time ". On the other hand, IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy is most compared with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and Protegrity Data Security, whereas iScramble is most compared with .

    See our list of best Data Masking vendors.

    We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.