Compare IBM Integration Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Integration Bus Logo
14,842 views|9,549 comparisons
Red Hat Fuse Logo
6,832 views|4,405 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Integration Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
465,891 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"IBM Integration Bus has a complete set of tools that are implemented between rules when it comes to run time, but it's not easy to understand.""My favorite feature is the XML-based DFDL mapping, which is a tool that allows you to graphically map legacy data formats to modern data formats.""From a performance point of view, it's very good and it doesn't need very much in terms of CPU resources.""This solution is very reliable and it is easy to learn.""The solution's features are all quite useful. We use all of them.""The integration with other tools is excellent. It integrates well with batch issues.""It has the ability to be deployed without rewriting the code.""The biggest advantage of this solution is that it is very easy to learn, and very easy to build applications."

More IBM Integration Bus Pros »

"The solution is stable. We have gone for months or years without any issue. There are no memory restarts, so from my point of view, it's very stable.""The most valuable feature is the software development environment.""We usually had used PowerCenter for master data integration (by replication). But in some cases, it was better to use Fuse for providing the master data online. It doesn't make it necessary to replicate data.""The installation is quite okay. We don't really change much in the configuration. Most of the time, most of the settings remain with the default and we are able to handle our needs using the default setting."

More Red Hat Fuse Pros »

"I would like to see more metered rest and API support. IBM is already working on it on Version 11, but it still needs improvement.""This solution would benefit from improvements to the configuration interface.""This product uses the PVU (Processor Value Unit) license model from IBM, and it is something that should be improved.""I would like to be able to run and install this solution on different platforms.""The user interface could be improved in a future release.""IBM could improve its connectivity.""I would like for them to make the training much easier.""One drawback that I have found is that there are issues with using the Java connector."

More IBM Integration Bus Cons »

"The pricing model could be adjusted. The price should be lower.""Our clients would like to see the user interface improved so that it is more user-friendly.""I don't know the product last versions. I know they are migrating a microservices concepts. We still didn't get there... but we are in the process.""Currently, the main point of concern for us is how flexible it is to cater to different requirements. It should be more flexible."

More Red Hat Fuse Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Our licensing is based on a five-year contract, and as far as I know, there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fee.""The price of this product could be lower.""The solution requires a license and is very expensive here in India."

More IBM Integration Bus Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

More Red Hat Fuse Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
465,891 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It has the ability to be deployed without rewriting the code.
Top Answer: I would like for them to make the training much easier. Once you work with a sphere of people that can integrate the solution, then it's stable. But just to educate people, it's not that easy to do… more »
Top Answer: We implement this solution for our customers.
Top Answer: If I choose the standalone installation, what is the best configuration: with Spring Boot or with JBoss EAP?
out of 24 in ESB
Average Words per Review
out of 24 in ESB
Average Words per Review
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM WebSphere ESB
Fuse ESB, FuseSource
Learn More
IBM Integration Bus is an enterprise integration engine that offers a fast, simple way for systems and applications to communicate with each other. As a result, it can help you achieve business value, reduce IT complexity and save money.

Red Hat JBoss Fuse is a lightweight, flexible integration platform that enables rapid integration across the extended enterprise - on-premise or in the cloud. JBoss Fuse includes modular integration capabilities, an enterprise service bus (ESB), to unlock information.

Learn more about IBM Integration Bus
Learn more about Red Hat Fuse
Sample Customers
Salesbox, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Road Buddy, Swiss Federal Railways, Electricity Supply Board, The Hartree Centre, ESB Networks
Avianca, American Product Distributors (APD), Kings College Hospital, AMD, CenturyLink, AECOM, E*TRADE
Top Industries
Financial Services Firm50%
Computer Software Company18%
Comms Service Provider9%
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm8%
Insurance Company7%
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise66%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Integration Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
465,891 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in ESB with 20 reviews while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 8th in ESB with 4 reviews. IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "A GUI that greatly simplifies data transformation and application developmet, but it is difficult to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Default settings are enough to handle most requirements, but needs more flexibility". IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM WebSphere Message Broker, Oracle Service Bus, IBM DataPower Gateway and webMethods Integration Server, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, Oracle Service Bus, TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and webMethods Integration Server. See our IBM Integration Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse report.

See our list of best ESB vendors.

We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.