Compare IBM Integration Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse

IBM Integration Bus is ranked 3rd in ESB with 7 reviews while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in ESB with 2 reviews. IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.8, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "A GUI that greatly simplifies data transformation and application developmet, but it is difficult to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "A solution offering easy setup and fast deployment with an ability to scale quickly". IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, Oracle Service Bus and IBM WebSphere DataPower, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator. See our IBM Integration Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Integration Bus Logo
12,527 views|8,644 comparisons
Red Hat Fuse Logo
5,286 views|4,128 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Integration Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
This solution is very reliable and it is easy to learn.From a performance point of view, it's very good and it doesn't need very much in terms of CPU resources.My favorite feature is the XML-based DFDL mapping, which is a tool that allows you to graphically map legacy data formats to modern data formats.IBM Integration Bus has a complete set of tools that are implemented between rules when it comes to run time, but it's not easy to understand.It is very straightforward. It is very user-friendly integration.It is one of the most stable products which I have seen in the market.Easy to understand documentation with a huge list of examples and tutorials.Web interface, REST API for viewing services, admin, stats, and deployment are premium features, which makes IIB stand among its competition.

Read more »

The solution is stable. We have gone for months or years without any issue. There are no memory restarts, so from my point of view, it's very stable.I found it was quite easy to set up and implement.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to be able to run and install this solution on different platforms.This product uses the PVU (Processor Value Unit) license model from IBM, and it is something that should be improved.This solution would benefit from improvements to the configuration interface.I would like to see more metered rest and API support. IBM is already working on it on Version 11, but it still needs improvement.To scale virtically, is difficult.IBM does not support orchestration, which is how they designed it, and other BPM tools in the market support orchestration. If they merged the BPM capability into this product, then it would be a better solution.Development toolkit (based on Eclipse) should be improved in terms of responsiveness.Current aggregation implementation should be deprecated. MQ independent, as well as an intuitive solution, should be proposed.

Read more »

The pricing model could be adjusted. The price should be lower.The web tools need to be updated.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our licensing is based on a five-year contract, and as far as I know, there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fee.Support costs are high compared to the competition. Otherwise, the support is good.Pricing is on par with its competition.

Read more »

We found other solutions were more costly.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
3rd
out of 24 in ESB
Views
12,527
Comparisons
8,644
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
714
Avg. Rating
8.7
4th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
5,286
Comparisons
4,128
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
463
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 46% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Also Known As
IBM WebSphere ESBFuse ESB, FuseSource
Learn
IBM
Red Hat
Overview
IBM Integration Bus is an enterprise integration engine that offers a fast, simple way for systems and applications to communicate with each other. As a result, it can help you achieve business value, reduce IT complexity and save money.

Red Hat JBoss Fuse is a lightweight, flexible integration platform that enables rapid integration across the extended enterprise - on-premise or in the cloud. JBoss Fuse includes modular integration capabilities, an enterprise service bus (ESB), to unlock information.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Integration Bus
Learn more about Red Hat Fuse
Sample Customers
Salesbox, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Road Buddy, Swiss Federal Railways, Electricity Supply Board, The Hartree Centre, ESB Networks Avianca, American Product Distributors (APD), Kings College Hospital, AMD, CenturyLink, AECOM, E*TRADE
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm57%
Software R&D Company14%
Government14%
Transportation Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company36%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider8%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company35%
Financial Services Firm9%
Comms Service Provider8%
Retailer8%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Integration Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email