IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL] vs Mindjet MindManager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
views| comparisons
MindManager Logo
599 views|482 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL] and Mindjet MindManager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Social Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL]?
Milos Simovic
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price was very good in the beginning, then the price increased from USD $99.00 to USD $249.00, then I stopped upgrading because what I needed was already there."
  • More Mindjet MindManager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Enterprise Social Software
    4th
    Views
    599
    Comparisons
    482
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Social Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Lotus Quickr
    Mindjet
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Lotus Quickr is team collaboration software that can help you access and interact with the people, information and project materials you need to get your work done.

    Lotus Quickr team spaces, content libraries, team discussion forums, wikis, and connectors make it easy to share documents and information amongst a team, and Lotus Quickr software works with your enterprise content management system, as well as with Lotus Notes, Lotus Connections, Lotus Sametime, Lotus Symphony, Microsoft Office and Microsoft Outlook.

    MindManager Enterprise combines mind mapping, diagram creation, and visual business and project planning tools with patented data integration and flexible sharing options. The result is improved enterprise communication and collaboration on key business initiatives.

    Sample Customers
    Aibel AS, KDZ Wiesbaden, Ahlers AG, Integra Legal, Rheinmetall AG
    Education Development Center Inc., Ekso Bionics, SensorLink, Dow Chemical Company, Consolidated Edison Company, Genencor
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government16%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Social Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Social Software while Mindjet MindManager is ranked 4th in Mind Mapping Software. IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Mindjet MindManager is rated 9.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mindjet MindManager writes "An Easy to use tool for brainstorming and planning, compatible with Microsoft Project". IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL] is most compared with Oracle WebCenter and Atlassian Confluence, whereas Mindjet MindManager is most compared with Visio, draw.io, Office 365, Atlassian Confluence and Lucidchart.

    We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.