IBM LotusLive [EOL] vs Planview IdeaPlace comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
views| comparisons
Planview Logo
120 views|12 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM LotusLive [EOL] and Planview IdeaPlace based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Social Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Because the platform is used in another department, we have one parent. We are able to break off and do platforms for other business units under that parent."
  • "The yearly licensing cost is $55,000."
  • "We have a tiered annual licensing fee."
  • "Planview could drop the price for Spigit. I've done two market assessments and I think that they're overpriced pretty considerably right now."
  • More Planview IdeaPlace Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Enterprise Social Software
    Views
    120
    Comparisons
    12
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Social Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    LotusLive
    Planview Spigit, Spigit
    Learn More
    Planview
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    IBM LotusLive is a portfolio of online services, hosted by IBM, that delivers scalable, security-rich email, Web conferencing and collaboration solutions. LotusLive is delivered through the SaaS model. LotusLive services provide users with new ways to work more effectively with people inside and outside their company, including customers, partners and suppliers, at a very predictable monthly rate.

    Join the 6M+ employees at 500+ enterprise companies that are using Planview IdeaPlace (formerly Planview Spigit) to bring the power of collective intelligence to every business challenge.

    Sample Customers
    IMM, ADP, Nice Céte d'Azur, Ultra Petroleum, Erhvervsstyrelsen, Durham Police Department, Globo, Whogohost Ltd., Infinity Computers and Communications Company, Varian Medical Systems, Vasaloppet, Keyword, North Pacific Bank Ltd.
    Pfizer, UnitedHealth Group, Citi, AT&T, Cambia Health, Siemens, Veridian Credit Union, Polaris, UNHCR, CCA Global
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Energy/Utilities Company25%
    Healthcare Company25%
    Retailer13%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Large Enterprise88%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Social Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM LotusLive [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Social Software while Planview IdeaPlace is ranked 1st in Innovation Management Software. IBM LotusLive [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Planview IdeaPlace is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Planview IdeaPlace writes "Provides a mechanism for our leadership to understand the pulse of what's happening in our operations". IBM LotusLive [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Planview IdeaPlace is most compared with .

    We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.