IBM LotusLive [EOL] vs Symphony comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
views| comparisons
Symphony Logo
840 views|689 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM LotusLive [EOL] and Symphony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Social Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It's a costly product, but the number of available features justifies it."
  • "It is fairly an expensive product, but works for us."
  • "Symphony is expensive."
  • More Symphony Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Symphony and Laravel are the most comfortable frameworks for any developer. It is also lightweight.
    Top Answer:The solution needs to improve CI.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Enterprise Social Software
    Views
    840
    Comparisons
    689
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    318
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    LotusLive
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM LotusLive is a portfolio of online services, hosted by IBM, that delivers scalable, security-rich email, Web conferencing and collaboration solutions. LotusLive is delivered through the SaaS model. LotusLive services provide users with new ways to work more effectively with people inside and outside their company, including customers, partners and suppliers, at a very predictable monthly rate.

    Symphony’s secure, cloud-based communications service delivers the next wave in organizational productivity where markets and individuals come together to create vibrant communities in which to share content, insights and opinions without compromising on organizational compliance.

    Sample Customers
    IMM, ADP, Nice Céte d'Azur, Ultra Petroleum, Erhvervsstyrelsen, Durham Police Department, Globo, Whogohost Ltd., Infinity Computers and Communications Company, Varian Medical Systems, Vasaloppet, Keyword, North Pacific Bank Ltd.
    BNP Paribas, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, Citi, Credit Suisse, JP Morgan Chase
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm64%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    Insurance Company3%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise82%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Social Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM LotusLive [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Social Software while Symphony is ranked 8th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. IBM LotusLive [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Symphony is rated 7.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symphony writes "Makes tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier". IBM LotusLive [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Symphony is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Slack, Drupal and SharePoint.

    See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.