We performed a comparison between IBM MaaS360 and Ionic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."I believe that the solution is actually in Gartner's top quadrant at the moment for mobile device management."
"The synchronization of Intune with other Microsoft solutions is a valuable feature."
"It helps implement conditional access policies to restrict mobile users from accessing potentially dangerous emails."
"Stable product that's easy to set up compared to other MDM products."
"The one feature we find most useful is the Mobile Application Manager. There are two types, we have the complete MDM and the Mobile Application Manager(MAM). We don't give our users phones, it is their own personal phone, and we need to allow them to have access to the company detail on their phone. We need to create a balance between their own personal data and the company data. We deploy the Mobile Application Manager for them so that we won't be able to interfere with their own personal data."
"The most important thing for me is the autopilot feature."
"Great for software update needs, operating system version updates, and security policy enforcement."
"We can securely manage both company-owned devices and personal devices enrolled in our BYOD program."
"The solution is quite stable."
"It allows us to have an updated inventory of all the devices in real-time with the ability to add personalized information."
"We introduced the product as part of the SOC-2 requirement. The tool's most valuable features include keeping the operating system updated, tracking software inventory, controlling computer administrators, and the ability to wipe a computer in case of a security threat. It helps us to be compliant, and it is one of the reasons we implemented it."
"The most valuable features of IBM MaaS360 are encryption and mobile design."
"Using this solution has made things more convenient. Earlier, we had to depend a lot more on IT to find and resolve our issues."
"My customers value the ability to control all their devices from a central point in IBM MaaS360."
"We've found the scalability to be very good."
"It can change policies based on geolocation or schedules."
"Ionic's best features are its hybrid app development, design, and tags."
"Ionic is easy to upgrade and is helpful for design purposes. It also is quite common and easy to use. It is a very reliable application. It's easy to write on and print. The UI is easy to use as well. My organization chose to go with Ionic because we can access both Android and iOS applications."
"The most valuable feature of Ionic is the ease of use and the simple connection of the applications. Additionally, the documentation is good in the Ionic application, and beginners can easily learn and download their own application using Ionic. Everyone can easily switch out, their domain, from native applications to hybrid applications."
"The solution can support many languages."
"I like that I can place the code and escalate data storage. I also like that it's user-friendly. Nothing is complex in Ionic."
"The most valuable feature is the one code deployed to all solutions, which means you do not need to have multiple teams."
"It's very flexible for UI development."
"With the Capacitor feature, you have access to the native attributes of your phone such as your camera. This makes work a lot easier."
"They need to add more group policies. Intune currently does not have many group policies that you can deploy. Its reporting, which is very limited at the moment, also needs improvement. It will be great if they can add report customization. Its stability needs to be improved. Sometimes, when you register a device in Intune, it doesn't show up instantly on the engine portal on the admin side. They need to provide better support for complicated issues. They also have a long turnaround time."
"I think there should be a better tracking of the cell phones used on the Intune."
"It would help if administrators could pinpoint the exact location of a stolen device to help law enforcement retrieve it and apprehend the suspect."
"The technical support could be improved."
"Intune's areas for improvement revolve around security and certificate management."
"The biggest problem we ever have is when something goes out of date after 30 days when nobody has logged into it. We do have a problem trying to get those back online. We've been working with Microsoft to resolve that problem, but that's been the only issue that we've had in the last few years."
"One big problem with Microsoft is that they're changing the names of the products quite often, or they're quite consistently doing so. Intune is now Endpoint administration. Constantly switching the user interface or the administrative interface makes it quite hard to keep pace. If you are on a two-week holiday and you come back and look at the same screen you have looked at for the last couple of months, it looks different, which is annoying. Changing things around all the time doesn't make it easy."
"The installation is very easy. However, to be able to configure it you will need special knowledge, such as training or self-studies to have a proper level of security. There are many settings one has to understand before being able to implement Microsoft Intune."
"IBM MaaS360 can improve the information provided for DLP control. Some of our customers would benefit from this."
"Zero day support is something they can work on. They can make it a little bit more user-friendly."
"It's difficult for someone like me to set up a phone that doesn't require a SIM card, like Apple's new phones."
"The reporting and alerting could be improved."
"IBM MaaS360’s threat management feature needs improvement. It could identify even more malicious attacks."
"The user interface could definitely use some improvement."
"The interface is clunky and the layout is a bit outdated. Also, I don't think MaaS360 has as many features as Intune. It doesn't integrate with Office as seamlessly as Intune does, which isn't surprising, given that Intune and Office are Microsoft products."
"An area for improvement would be handshaking with Microsoft in terms of trying to get a DLP on Microsoft OS."
"There could be better support for augmented reality and other things. Geolocation and background app activity are some of the things that are a little more clumsy at the moment and could be improved."
"Documentation for migrations and compatibility is insufficient."
"As a developer, I would say one of the improvements is more plugins."
"The documentation could be improved."
"It would be good if the mobile version uses something other than JavaScript and HTML."
"It would be better if it had a speed niche system. There are a lot of things we need that weren't in the latest version. But I think they will be adding something."
"Ionic could improve in the Native mode because while we do testing it is difficult to find the root cause of problems. It could be more user-friendly."
"Ionic is a cross-platform framework, so when we compare Ionic with native Android and iOS, we can see the drawbacks. For example, if you need to work on very high-level aspects of an application such as animation, even if everything else is not putting load on the app, you will still see high load from the server side."
IBM MaaS360 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 34 reviews while Ionic is ranked 4th in Mobile Development Platforms with 14 reviews. IBM MaaS360 is rated 7.8, while Ionic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM MaaS360 writes "It lets you separate work and personal data on mobile phones, but the interface is outdated and clunky". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ionic writes "Great user acceptance and reliability, multiple teams not required, with prompt customer service". IBM MaaS360 is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl, IBM MobileFirst and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM), whereas Ionic is most compared with Xamarin Platform, OutSystems, Appium, Mendix and Appzillon Digital Platform.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.