IBM Maximo vs JIRA Service Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The incident management feature is good because it allows you to keep track of and classify issues.""The most valuable feature is the ability to correct maintenance.""The most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance.""It is configurable, where you can add extra fields to screens and to the database.""They have a real strength of tracking the asset itself along with the condition of the asset, the maintenance of the asset and who has access to the asset, etc.""IBM Maximo is the best software for assets management.""There are not many enterprise asset management systems on the market and not many that have the categories that IBM Maximo has.""I have found Work Order management the most valuable feature. Additionally, it is a very robust and powerful solution."

More IBM Maximo Pros →

"The initial setup is easy and straightforward.""We get software developed faster.""It is much more controlled and allows for different kinds of customization that we can plan and implement based on the project requirements.""It has improved our work in a number of ways. First, it has made everything much faster. Before Jira Service Management, it could take weeks to resolve a ticket.""We can track, monitor, and get all the details we need from the end-user's point of view for any service request.""In Jira Service Management, the most beneficial features are process improvement, workflows, and escalations.""Developing processes is easy and user-friendly.""I find the Kanban chart where we put each story in to be the most valuable feature. We use the Kanban chart to revise the project every morning in our five-minute meeting."

More JIRA Service Management Pros →

Cons
"Vendor management needs enhancement.""Could use some alignment regarding some standards and the tracking of the IT assets. Even though they have all of the information (i.e. where are the assets, who owns the asset, etc.), they were not mapping it to different cyber standards.""Areas for improvement would be the user interface and support for Arabic. They could also be more customer-oriented.""Initial setup is a longer process because Maximo is bigger and has more processes.""It was very slow due to the lagging issues. So that was kind of frustrating, considering how slow it was while functioning.""Coding can be complex when customization is required.""The pricing model of the solution has room for improvement as well as the after-sales support.""IBM Maximo can improve the financial support and financial application, to make it more similar to an ERP as opposed to an EAM. Overall they can improve the financial processes."

More IBM Maximo Cons →

"I would like to see the user interface changed, it is not very user-friendly, and it transitions workflows.""The way it handles subtasks can be improved. We would really like the ability to have different types of subtasks. If we have a user story for a feature, we would like to have a subtask for documentation, a subtask for requirements, a subtask for development, and a subtask for testing. Right now, we just make four subtasks, but there is no way to specify their type, so we have to add a custom field to specify what type of work is this. It just means you've got to look at more data. For logging time or time tracking, we would like to have something using which we can define the work type we're doing. We would like to log whether we're working on a bug, a new development, scope change, or rework. We've got a user story for which we do the dev, and then we have to do more dev. It is the same story, but some of it could have been a scope change, and some of it could be a rework because we either screwed up the first time or missed something obvious. Currently, we have to have a custom field and track that separately. It would be nice to have some kind of work type for logging time.""We have tried exporting some of the test cases into Jira from Excel. The interface for that isn't very user-friendly.""The initial setup is very complex.""This solution lacks features for project management.""It would be better if it had capabilities to connect to mobile applications (e.g., Whatsapp)""We have a lot of add-ons, however, instead of the add-ons, for example, cloning could be better.""As a consultant, I have used the support. Some of the support I have received has been good and other times it could improve."

More JIRA Service Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "You pay for what you get. There are lots of options depending on how you would like to implement Maximo."
  • "The concurrent user license is much more effective in management and cost-wise, as it is more suitable for maintenance management."
  • "Where available, concurrent licenses can be more cost efficient and provide more flexibility."
  • "Explore the possibility of using DB2. You will avoid the cost of SQL Server or Oracle licenses."
  • "​Explore internal processes in order to evaluate the correct number of users in each Maximo module, then evaluate the different offers of pricing and licensing.​"
  • "I do not know about the price of the solution. However, this has been an expensive project overall."
  • "IBM Maximo offers a licensing application, and you have to comply with the license."
  • "IBM has changed the licensing policy. As I understand now, they are going from a complex way of licensing to a more simple way of licensing."
  • More IBM Maximo Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Costs are about $50 per user per year. JIRA is sold in user tiers of 25, 50, 100, 250, 500, 2000, 10,000, and unlimited users. It is bad when you have 51 users then the price is based on that 100 user tier. Users at 100 will be the most cost effective."
  • "JIRA Service Desk has different pricing as it is based on agents. On average, the price is about $300 per agent."
  • "Do not forget to calculate add-on costs. These cost a percentage of the JIRA purchasing costs and are based on the number of JIRA users."
  • "Buying a software solution is only a half part of the solution (or even less). You need to optimize usage of the software by hiring professionals who will help you to make the most of the software, especially in the beginning."
  • "I would suggest to always buy licenses through an Atlassian partner, so you can also rely on their expertise."
  • "But about the plugins, I found one plug-in — its name is Actionable Metric I think — and it is $3000. That is very expensive for users in Iran."
  • "Actually in Iran we don't have copyright or intellectual property, so we can use JIRA for free."
  • "It's not really expensive, especially when you compare to ServiceNow or other solutions, and it's not expensive to maintain."
  • More JIRA Service Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It can be particularly useful for power line operations, enabling linemen in the field to gather information and send it across the country as well as different parts of the world.
    Top Answer:Though I liked it a lot, I think it was lagging a lot. It was very slow due to the lagging issues. So that was kind of frustrating, considering how slow it was while functioning. The aforementioned… more »
    Top Answer:It can be particularly useful for power line operations, enabling linemen in the field to gather information and send it across the country as well as different parts of the world. With IBM Maximo, we… more »
    Top Answer:We use JIRA Service Management for tracking purposes, planning, and execution.
    Top Answer:It is one of the premium products on the market, but it is very costly, especially in the Indian market. Smaller organizations cannot afford it. We pay monthly licensing costs. We only have to pay for… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,375
    Comparisons
    1,219
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    513
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    6,885
    Comparisons
    4,820
    Reviews
    36
    Average Words per Review
    550
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Maximo
    JIRA Service Desk
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Maximo is designed to help organizations effectively manage and maintain their physical assets, such as equipment, facilities, and infrastructure. Maximo provides a comprehensive set of tools and features to optimize asset performance, increase operational efficiency, and reduce maintenance costs. 

    With Maximo, organizations can track asset information, schedule maintenance activities, manage work orders, and generate reports for data-driven decision-making. It enables proactive maintenance planning, streamlines workflows, and improves asset uptime. Maximo is scalable, flexible, and can integrate with other enterprise systems to provide a unified view of asset information. Overall, IBM Maximo is a robust EAM solution that empowers organizations to effectively manage their assets throughout their lifecycle and maximize their value.

     IBM Maximo Features:

    • Asset Management: Maximo enables organizations to effectively manage their assets by providing tools for asset tracking, maintenance scheduling, and condition monitoring. It helps organizations maximize asset uptime and extend their lifespan.
    • Work and Maintenance Management: The software allows users to create and manage work orders, track work progress, schedule maintenance activities, and allocate resources efficiently. It helps streamline maintenance processes and improve productivity.
    • Inventory and Procurement Management: Maximo includes inventory management functionalities that enable organizations to track and manage their inventory levels, monitor stock availability, and streamline procurement processes. It helps optimize inventory usage and reduce costs.
    • Service Management: Maximo facilitates service request management, incident tracking, and service level agreement (SLA) monitoring. It helps organizations deliver quality service to their customers and track service performance.
    • Mobile Access: Maximo offers mobile capabilities, allowing users to access and update asset information, perform inspections, and manage work orders using mobile devices. It improves field workforce productivity and enables real-time data capture.
    • Reporting and Analytics: The software provides robust reporting and analytics features, enabling users to generate custom reports, track key performance indicators (KPIs), and gain insights into asset performance and maintenance activities. It supports data-driven decision-making.
    • Integration Capabilities: Maximo can integrate with other enterprise systems, such as financial systems, enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, and Internet of Things (IoT) platforms, to streamline data exchange and enable a unified view of asset information.
    • Scalability and Flexibility: IBM Maximo is designed to support organizations of various sizes and industries, from small businesses to large enterprises. It offers flexibility to customize workflows, data fields, and business rules to align with specific organizational requirements.

    IBM Maximo Benefits:

    • Improved Asset Performance: Maximize uptime and extend asset lifespan through effective tracking, maintenance scheduling, and condition monitoring.
    • Increased Efficiency: Streamline work orders, resource allocation, and maintenance processes for enhanced operational efficiency and productivity.
    • Cost Reduction: Optimize inventory levels, streamline procurement, and reduce maintenance costs through proactive planning and resource utilization.
    • Enhanced Service Delivery: Effectively manage service requests, track incidents, and monitor SLAs for improved customer satisfaction and service quality.
    • Real-time Insights: Generate custom reports, track KPIs, and gain real-time insights into asset performance and maintenance activities for data-driven decision-making.
    • Mobile Access and Field Productivity: Access and update asset information, perform inspections, and manage work orders using mobile devices, increasing field workforce productivity.
    • Regulatory Compliance and Risk Management: Ensure compliance with regulations and standards, and proactively manage risks through maintenance planning and compliance monitoring.
    • Integration and Scalability: Seamlessly integrate with other systems for a unified view of asset information, and accommodate the needs of organizations of various sizes and industries.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Chris Lok, COO / Developer at MaxLogic, states that IBM Maximo is “A rare enterprise asset management system with good ROI and helpful technical support”

    Klemen Muhvič, Computer System Engineer at Informatika d.d., writes that IBM Maximo's "Most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance."

    Anil Bhagwatsaran, Application Specialist at Blue Waters, says that "The most valuable features of IBM Maximo are the overall power and interface, and there are a lot of different modules that we use that are helpful. Additionally, it's an integrated solution and it has a lot of capabilities."


    JIRA Service Management is Atlassian’s IT service management (ITSM) solution. It unlocks all teams at high velocity by:

    1. Accelerating the flow of work between IT teams, development teams, and business teams

    2. Empowering teams to deliver their service more quickly

    3. Bringing visibility to their work

    Built on JIRA, JIRA Service Management enables best practices across request, incident, problem, change, knowledge, asset, and configuration management so that teams can streamline collaboration between themselves. More than 30,000 customers of all sizes rely on JIRA Service Management to deliver service.

    JIRA Service Management Features

    JIRA Service Management has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Request management: Allows businesses to manage work across teams with one platform so employees and customers get the help they need quickly.
    • Problem management: To minimize the impact of incidents, this feature groups incidents, fast-tracks root cause analysis, and records workarounds.
    • Change management: IT teams are empowered by richer contextual information around changes from software development tools. This helps them minimize risk and make better decisions.
    • Asset management: Manage inventory efficiently, track lifecycles and ownership, and reduce costs.
    • Configuration management: Attain visibility into the infrastructure that supports critical services and applications. Understand service dependencies to minimize risk.
    • Incident management: The solution brings development and IT teams together to rapidly respond to, resolve, and learn from incidents.
    • Knowledge management: While fostering team collaboration, the solution enables self-service, deflection of more requests, and management of knowledge articles.

    JIRA Service Management Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing JIRA Service Management. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • The solution empowers all teams across IT, development, and business with intuitive, flexible workflows.
    • Work is made visible through the open and collaborative JIRA platform.
    • Connect IT and development on a single platform to accelerate workflow.
    • Gain significant ROI with competitive pricing on useful features.
    • Benefit from faster time to value by implementing a full ITSM solution in just a few months.
    • Lower total cost of ownership without expensive ongoing maintenance and upgrades.
    • Enjoy a broad ecosystem of more than 4,000 best-in-class apps and integrations.

    Reviews from Real Users

    JIRA Service Management stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its stability, its easy customization, and its seamless integration with other solutions. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    Abhishek S., a Program Lead at PureSoftware, writes of the solution, “You can scale the solution whether it is deployed to the cloud or the data center. While we might have up to 5,200 people using the solution, we do not require that many licenses, as only those dealing with the tickets are required to be licensed.”

    Andrew B., a Technical Engineer at a consultancy firm, notes, “One of the valuable features is that an automatic response or action can be taken on tickets. We can have certain responses for tickets that contain keywords or are logged and tagged with certain labels.”

    Sample Customers
    Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., DTE Energy, Swedish Match, Projetech, Fingrid, East Coast
    mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Energy/Utilities Company21%
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Government14%
    Non Tech Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization32%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company35%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Retailer9%
    Transportation Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business54%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise42%
    Large Enterprise45%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Maximo vs. IFS Cloud Platform
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Maximo vs. IFS Cloud Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management with 6 reviews while JIRA Service Management is ranked 2nd in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 36 reviews. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while JIRA Service Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Provides great flexibility although coding can be complex when customizing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JIRA Service Management writes "It lets you configure workflows and manage requests; it has a dashboard for monitoring". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, NetSuite ERP, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, IFS Cloud Platform and Oracle Enterprise Asset Management, whereas JIRA Service Management is most compared with ServiceNow, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, BMC Helix ITSM, Freshdesk and Zoho Desk.

    We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.