IBM MobileFirst vs Motorola Rhomobile comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
337 views|208 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Motorola Logo
35 views|23 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM MobileFirst and Motorola Rhomobile based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Mobile Development Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Cost depends upon various factors. Size of the overall application and product usage matter a lot. For an enterprise-grade application, this certainly comes out as an economical solution. However, for small-scale applications, it can turn out to be on the higher side."
  • More IBM MobileFirst Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    337
    Comparisons
    208
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    35
    Comparisons
    23
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Mobile Development Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MobileFirst, Worklight
    Rhomobile
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Worklight helps organizations extend their business to mobile devices.

    Supported by a thriving, open source community and built around modern coding languages like JavaScript, HTML5 and CSS3, RhoMobile Suite leverages existing web development skills to build feature-rich, native enterprise applications. Styling libraries of advanced widgets and effects are easy to integrate, making it simple to create better-looking, better-working apps. True write-once, run-anywhere capability frees developers from having to tweak code to support additional operating systems. And seamless, out of the box data sync simplifies back-end integration and connects users to business-critical intelligence, whether they’re online or off.

    Sample Customers
    UniCredit Business Integrated Solutions, Gruppo Unipol, Raymond James Financial, Toshiba GCS, CST, ABK-Systeme GmbH, BNP Paribas
    Los Angeles Police Department
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Real Estate/Law Firm7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise59%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Mobile Development Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM MobileFirst is ranked 14th in Mobile Development Platforms while Motorola Rhomobile is ranked 26th in Mobile Development Platforms. IBM MobileFirst is rated 8.4, while Motorola Rhomobile is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM MobileFirst writes "It provides access management for the enterprise user as well as for the consumer". On the other hand, IBM MobileFirst is most compared with IBM MaaS360, Ionic, SAP Mobile Platform and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Motorola Rhomobile is most compared with .

    See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.