IBM MobileFirst vs Silk Mobile [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM MobileFirst and Silk Mobile [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Apple, Temenos and others in Mobile App Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Mobile App Platforms Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Cost depends upon various factors. Size of the overall application and product usage matter a lot. For an enterprise-grade application, this certainly comes out as an economical solution. However, for small-scale applications, it can turn out to be on the higher side."
  • More IBM MobileFirst Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    7th
    Views
    157
    Comparisons
    98
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Mobile App Platforms
    Buyer's Guide
    Mobile App Platforms
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Apple, Temenos and others in Mobile App Platforms. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MobileFirst, Worklight
    Borland Silk Mobile
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Worklight helps organizations extend their business to mobile devices.

    The Silk Mobile (formerly Borland Silk Mobile) bundle solution leverages the strength and breadth of the Silk Portfolio to deliver a powerful mobile testing platform that puts the customer experience at the center of test activity. Efficiently create, manage, and maintain functional and load tests to accelerate time to market and ensure a seamless mobile experience for customers who expect nothing less.

    Sample Customers
    UniCredit Business Integrated Solutions, Gruppo Unipol, Raymond James Financial, Toshiba GCS, CST, ABK-Systeme GmbH, BNP Paribas
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Real Estate/Law Firm7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise58%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Mobile App Platforms
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Apple, Temenos and others in Mobile App Platforms. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM MobileFirst is ranked 7th in Mobile App Platforms while Silk Mobile [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile App Platforms. IBM MobileFirst is rated 8.4, while Silk Mobile [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM MobileFirst writes "It provides access management for the enterprise user as well as for the consumer". On the other hand, IBM MobileFirst is most compared with IBM MaaS360, Ionic, SAP Mobile Platform and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Silk Mobile [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Mobile App Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Mobile App Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.