Bitbar vs IBM MobileFirst comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SmartBear Logo
69 views|46 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
154 views|96 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bitbar and IBM MobileFirst based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Apple, Temenos and others in Mobile App Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Mobile App Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Game testing and the API for apps are good.""Ability to use different frameworks."

More Bitbar Pros →

"With help of this product, we have been able to develop mobile applications without having complete knowledge of each mobile OS's native programming technology. App development, delivery, and code management have been very efficient using this product.""I like Its capability for developing hybrid applications, with an ability to integrate device-native code as well""IBM MobileFirst has one of the most feature-rich admin panels."

More IBM MobileFirst Pros →

Cons
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved.""Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."

More Bitbar Cons →

"I would like to see improved support for native device functions.""There are issues with push notifications, especially for Windows mobile apps. JSONStore also crashes abruptly at times."

More IBM MobileFirst Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle."
  • More Bitbar Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Cost depends upon various factors. Size of the overall application and product usage matter a lot. For an enterprise-grade application, this certainly comes out as an economical solution. However, for small-scale applications, it can turn out to be on the higher side."
  • More IBM MobileFirst Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    17th
    Views
    69
    Comparisons
    46
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    7th
    Views
    154
    Comparisons
    96
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Mobile App Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Apple, Temenos and others in Mobile App Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Testdroid
    MobileFirst, Worklight
    Learn More
    Overview
    Testdroid is a set of mobile software development and testing products by Bitbar Technologies Limited. Testdroid comprises three different products: Testdroid Cloud, Testdroid Recorder and Testdroid Enterprise. Testdroid provides an application programming interface through open source software available on GitHub. Testdroid can use testing frameworks, such as Robotium, Appium and uiautomator for native and Selenium for web applications, targeted for mobile application and game developers. Testdroid Cloud contains real Android and iOS powered devices, some of which are available for users. Testdroid Cloud lets users run tests simultaneously on cloud-based service. Testdroid Recorder is a tool for developers and testers for recording user-actions and producing JUnit based test cases on mobile application and games. Testdroid Recorder is available at the Eclipse marketplace. Testdroid Enterprise is a server software for managing automated testing on multiple real Android and iOS powered devices, supporting Gradle build system and Jenkins Continuous Integration.
    IBM Worklight helps organizations extend their business to mobile devices.
    Sample Customers
    Rovio, Paf, Supercell, NITRO Games, Seriously, AVG, Google, Bosch, Yahoo, Microsoft, Yandex, Mozilla, eBay, PayPal, TESCO, Cisco WebEx, Facebook, LinkedIn, skype, Subway
    UniCredit Business Integrated Solutions, Gruppo Unipol, Raymond James Financial, Toshiba GCS, CST, ABK-Systeme GmbH, BNP Paribas
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Government10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Healthcare Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Real Estate/Law Firm7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    Mobile App Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Apple, Temenos and others in Mobile App Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bitbar is ranked 17th in Mobile App Platforms while IBM MobileFirst is ranked 7th in Mobile App Platforms. Bitbar is rated 7.0, while IBM MobileFirst is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM MobileFirst writes "It provides access management for the enterprise user as well as for the consumer". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, SmartBear TestComplete, CrossBrowserTesting, Sauce Labs and LambdaTest, whereas IBM MobileFirst is most compared with IBM MaaS360, Ionic, SAP Mobile Platform and Microsoft Azure App Service.

    See our list of best Mobile App Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Mobile App Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.