Compare IBM MQ vs. Iron.io

IBM MQ is ranked 1st in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 11 reviews while Iron.io which is ranked 11th in Message Queue (MQ) Software. IBM MQ is rated 8.8, while Iron.io is rated 0. The top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "Helps integrate between applications, reduce rework, by reusing existing components". On the other hand, IBM MQ is most compared with RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ and Apache Kafka, whereas Iron.io is most compared with RabbitMQ and Apache Kafka.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM MQ Logo
38,792 views|23,760 comparisons
Iron.io Logo
639 views|226 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Iron.io? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Pivotal, Apache and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: August 2019.
360,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
To implement such an IBM solution, a company has to pay a lot in term of licensing and consultancy. A pricing model might be a better option.In terms of cost, IBM MQ is slightly on the higher side.IBM MQ appliance has pricing options, but they are costly.99.999 percent availability for less than a penny per message over the past 25 years. IBM MQ is the cheapest software in the IBM software portfolio, and it is one of the best.Pricing could be better, as with all IBM products. But their performance in production, along with security and scalability, will pay returns in the long run.I think the pricing is reasonable, especially with IIB as a part of it.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
360,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
38,792
Comparisons
23,760
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
245
Avg. Rating
8.8
Views
639
Comparisons
226
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 57% of the time.
Compared 43% of the time.
Also Known As
WebSphere MQIronMQ
Learn
IBM
Iron.io
Video Not Available
Overview

    IBM MQ provides the universal messaging backbone for service-oriented architecture (SOA) connectivity. It connects virtually any commercial IT system, whether on premise, in the cloud, or a mixture. For more than 20 years IBM has led the market in messaging middleware and more than 10,000 businesses across all geographies and industries rely on IBM MQ.

    Visit for your trial here.

IronMQ is an elastic message queue created specifically with the cloud in mind. It’s easy to use, runs on industrial-strength cloud infrastructure, and offers developers ready-to-use messaging with highly reliable delivery options and cloud-optimized performance.

Offer
Learn more about IBM MQ
Learn more about Iron.io
Sample Customers
Deutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp CorporationZenefits, Google, Turner, Whole Foods Market, Thrillist, Harry's, Untappd, Twitter, Consyl, Edeva, Hotel Tonight
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company15%
Retailer14%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm36%
Insurance Company15%
Retailer14%
Engineering Company9%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise88%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise86%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Pivotal, Apache and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: August 2019.
360,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email