Compare IBM MQ vs. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM MQ Logo
26,244 views|19,271 comparisons
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS Logo
278 views|263 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Solace and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: June 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price is high.""There is a different platform price between Windows, z/OS, and iSeries.""IBM products, in general, have high licensing costs and support costs are too high.""Most of our customers are quite happy with the solution but they have an issue with the cost. They want to move to cheaper solutions.""It is a very expensive product compared to the open source products in the market.""It would be a 10 out of 10 if it wasn't so expensive.""It's a very expensive product.""IBM MQ is expensive and they charge based on the CPU."

More IBM MQ Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi As someone with 45+ years of experience in the Transaction and Message Processing world, I have seen many "MQ" solutions that have come into the market place. From my perspective, while each… more »
Top Answer: Encryption and the fact that we have not had any data loss issues so far have been very valuable features. IBM MQ is well encrypted so that we are well within our compliance and regulatory… more »
Top Answer: This solution requires a license and we have purchased an enterprise license.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
26,244
Comparisons
19,271
Reviews
34
Average Words per Review
536
Rating
8.2
Views
278
Comparisons
263
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere MQ
Learn More
Overview

    IBM MQ provides the universal messaging backbone for service-oriented architecture (SOA) connectivity. It connects virtually any commercial IT system, whether on premise, in the cloud, or a mixture. For more than 20 years IBM has led the market in messaging middleware and more than 10,000 businesses across all geographies and industries rely on IBM MQ.

    Visit for your trial here.

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS extends the capabilities to our Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution, Red Hat OpenShift, for messaging services in the cloud.

Offer
Learn more about IBM MQ
Learn more about Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS
Sample Customers
Deutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp Corporation
E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm37%
Retailer12%
Insurance Company11%
Transportation Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Financial Services Firm20%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise86%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise84%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Solace and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: June 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM MQ is ranked 1st in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 35 reviews while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is ranked 13th in Message Queue (MQ) Software. IBM MQ is rated 8.2, while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "We don't lose messages in transit and we can store messages and forward them when required". On the other hand, IBM MQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, VMware RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ and PubSub+ Event Broker, whereas Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is most compared with Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ and Amazon SQS.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.