Compare IBM MQ vs. Software AG Optimize for Process

IBM MQ is ranked 1st in Business Activity Monitoring with 11 reviews while Software AG Optimize for Process which is ranked 9th in Business Activity Monitoring. IBM MQ is rated 8.8, while Software AG Optimize for Process is rated 0. The top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "Helps integrate between applications, reduce rework, by reusing existing components". On the other hand, IBM MQ is most compared with RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ and Apache Kafka, whereas Software AG Optimize for Process is most compared with Solace PubSub+.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM MQ Logo
38,792 views|23,760 comparisons
Software AG Optimize for Process Logo
234 views|73 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Software AG Optimize for Process? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Avada Software, Aurea and others in Business Activity Monitoring. Updated: August 2019.
360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
To implement such an IBM solution, a company has to pay a lot in term of licensing and consultancy. A pricing model might be a better option.In terms of cost, IBM MQ is slightly on the higher side.IBM MQ appliance has pricing options, but they are costly.99.999 percent availability for less than a penny per message over the past 25 years. IBM MQ is the cheapest software in the IBM software portfolio, and it is one of the best.Pricing could be better, as with all IBM products. But their performance in production, along with security and scalability, will pay returns in the long run.I think the pricing is reasonable, especially with IIB as a part of it.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Activity Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
38,792
Comparisons
23,760
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
245
Avg. Rating
8.8
Views
234
Comparisons
73
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Also Known As
WebSphere MQwebMethods Optimize for Process
Learn
IBM
Software AG
Overview

    IBM MQ provides the universal messaging backbone for service-oriented architecture (SOA) connectivity. It connects virtually any commercial IT system, whether on premise, in the cloud, or a mixture. For more than 20 years IBM has led the market in messaging middleware and more than 10,000 businesses across all geographies and industries rely on IBM MQ.

    Visit for your trial here.

Optimize for Process is a Business Activity Monitoring (BAM) solution that gives you real-time, actionable insight into process activity for greater operational control. You can see where to make proactive changes to prevent breakdowns and increase your service levels.

Offer
Learn more about IBM MQ
Learn more about Software AG Optimize for Process
Sample Customers
Deutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp CorporationSwisscom
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company15%
Retailer14%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm31%
Retailer12%
Insurance Company11%
Software R&D Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise88%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise86%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Avada Software, Aurea and others in Business Activity Monitoring. Updated: August 2019.
360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email