Compare IBM Multicloud Manager vs. Scalr

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Turbonomic Logo
9,611 views|4,443 comparisons
IBM Multicloud Manager Logo
81 views|45 comparisons
Scalr Logo
704 views|570 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, Nutanix and others in Cloud Management. Updated: April 2021.
502,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does.""It was an annual buy-in. You basically purchase it based on your host type stuff. The buy-in was about 20K, and the annual maintenance is about $3,000 a year.""I'm not involved in any of the billing, but my understanding is that is fairly expensive.""We see ROI in extended support agreements (ESA) for old software. Migration activities seem to be where Turbonomic has really benefited us the most. It's one click and done. We have new machines ready to go with Turbonomic, which are properly sized instead of somebody sitting there with a spreadsheet and guessing. So, my return on investment would certainly be on currency, from a software and hardware perspective.""When we have expanded our licensing, it has always been easy to make an ROI-based decision. So, it's reasonably priced. We would like to have it cheaper, but we get more benefit from it than we pay for it. At the end of the day, that's all you can hope for.""I know there have been some issues with the billing, when the numbers were first proposed, as to how much we would save. There was a huge miscommunication on our part. Turbonomic was led to believe that we could optimize our AWS footprint, because we didn't know we couldn't. So, we were promised savings of $750,000. Then, when we came to implement Turbonomic, the developers in AWS said, "Absolutely not. You're not putting that in our environment. We can't scale down anything because they coded it." Our AWS environment is a legacy environment. It has all these old applications, where all the developers who have made it are no longer with the company. Those applications generate a ton of money for us. So, if one breaks, we are really in trouble and they didn't want to have to deal with an environment that was changing and couldn't be supported. That number went from $750,000 to about $450,000. However, that wasn't Turbonomic's fault.""It is an endpoint type license, which is fine. It is not overly expensive.""The pricing and licensing are fair. We purchase based on benchmark pricing, which we have been able to get. There are no surprise charges nor hidden fees."

More Turbonomic Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
502,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The pricing and licensing are fair. We purchase based on benchmark pricing, which we have been able to get. There are no… more »
Top Answer: It would be nice for them to have a way to do something with physical machines, but I know that is not their strength… more »
Top Answer: We wanted the performance assurance because we have seasonal spikes in our volume. One of the use cases was making sure… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
VMTurbo Operations Manager
Learn More
Scalr
Video Not Available
Overview

Turbonomic Application Resource Management matches application demand to infrastructure supply to continuously ensure application performance. The software integrates with leading APM and IT service management solutions to form a control plane to automate IT resource management, on-premises and in multicloud environments.

IBM Multicloud Manager is the single dashboard that enables your enterprise to oversee multiple Kubernetes clusters wherever they are — on the public or private cloud

The Scalr Enterprise-Grade Cloud Management Platform enables today’s enterprises to achieve cost-effective, automated and standardized application deployments across multi-cloud environments. Scalr utilizes a hierarchical, top-down approach to policy enforcement that empowers administrators to find the balance between the needs of finance, security, IT and development teams.

Offer
Learn more about Turbonomic
Learn more about IBM Multicloud Manager
Learn more about Scalr
Sample Customers
JPMorgan Chase, First Canadian Title, UBS, Aetna, Alpha Maxx, London School of Economics, Expedia, JMC Steel Group, Southern Waste Systems.
American Airlines, UBank, Bitly, Eurobits, Active International, Bison, Contextor, Constance Hotels, Resorts & Golf, Creval, Deloitte, ExxonMobil, FaceMe, FacePhi, Fitzsoft, Fuga Technologies, Guardio, Honeywell, Japanese airline, Jenzabar, KONE
JPL, Expedia, Samsung, Acxiom, Accenture, Sony, Merkle, Autodesk
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company14%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company12%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm6%
Media Company5%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm11%
Non Profit5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise63%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business44%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise34%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, Nutanix and others in Cloud Management. Updated: April 2021.
502,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Multicloud Manager is ranked 57th in Cloud Management while Scalr is ranked 31st in Cloud Management. IBM Multicloud Manager is rated 0.0, while Scalr is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM Multicloud Manager is most compared with Red Hat CloudForms, whereas Scalr is most compared with VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), Cloudify, RightScale Cloud Management Platform, Nutanix Calm and Red Hat CloudForms.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.