We performed a comparison between IBM OpenPages and Qualys Policy Compliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ability to keep a record of internal incidents in the company, and also the monitoring of Key Indicators."
"The product’s interface is very intuitive."
"The content, reporting, and workflow features stand out as the most valuable aspects."
"It's a simple product."
"The most valuable feature of QualysGuard Policy Compliance is the automation that can detect real-time threats and decrease risks."
"The solution must allow customization in reporting."
"I believe there's room for improvement in establishing connections with external information."
"IBM OpenPages needs improvement in its UI. Currently, it is difficult to see the relationships (associations/parents) between all items unless you click on the item itself."
"The reporting needs improvement."
"It would be good if the solution’s technical support could be faster."
IBM OpenPages is ranked 2nd in IT Governance with 5 reviews while Qualys Policy Compliance is ranked 7th in IT Governance with 3 reviews. IBM OpenPages is rated 6.6, while Qualys Policy Compliance is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM OpenPages writes "Enables us to manage global workflow and users' relationships with the links". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys Policy Compliance writes "Easy to use, fast, and reliable". IBM OpenPages is most compared with RSA Archer, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, SAP BusinessObjects GRC and AuditBoard, whereas Qualys Policy Compliance is most compared with . See our IBM OpenPages vs. Qualys Policy Compliance report.
See our list of best IT Governance vendors.
We monitor all IT Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
