IBM OpenPages vs Riskonnect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
1,179 views|894 comparisons
33% willing to recommend
Riskonnect Logo
248 views|201 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM OpenPages and Riskonnect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Olawale Ayuba
Use Riskonnect?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Here are the new features and capabilities of IBM OpenPages v8.2 The new task-focused user interface makes finding and completing tasks easier, such as creating and managing risks, incidents, and… more »
Top Answer:The product’s interface is very intuitive.
Top Answer:IBM can provide expertise in support and implementation rather than third-party SaaS. The pricing could also be improved.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
8th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
1,179
Comparisons
894
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
289
Rating
8.0
27th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
248
Comparisons
201
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
OpenPages
Learn More
Overview
Enables customers to manage risk and compliance initiatives across the enterprise, helping businesses to reduce loss, improve decision-making about resource allocation, and optimize business performance.

Riskonnect, Inc. is the only provider of true Integrated Risk Management solutions. Riskonnect is the trusted, preferred source of Integrated Risk Management technology, offering a growing suite of solutions on a world-class cloud computing model that enable clients to elevate their programs for management of all risks across the enterprise. Riskonnect allows organizations to holistically understand, manage and control risks, positively affecting shareholder value.

Riskonnect’s highly configurable technology is ideal for forward-thinking organizations facing increased scrutiny and accountability for corporate governance, strategy and strategic risk. Our solutions facilitate the ability to plan for and respond intelligently to all risks that could potentially harm an organization and its competitive position, damage corporate reputation and/or restrict strategic growth.

Sample Customers
Nationwide, Process Innovation AG, OSRAM Licht AG, Dep‹sito Central de Valores (DCV), Delta Lloyd Group, Unum
Savage Services, Southwest Airlines, Kaiser Permanente
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm29%
Computer Software Company11%
Healthcare Company9%
Manufacturing Company4%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise78%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM OpenPages is ranked 8th in GRC with 5 reviews while Riskonnect is ranked 27th in GRC. IBM OpenPages is rated 6.6, while Riskonnect is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM OpenPages writes "Enables us to manage global workflow and users' relationships with the links". On the other hand, IBM OpenPages is most compared with RSA Archer, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, SAP BusinessObjects GRC and AuditBoard, whereas Riskonnect is most compared with RSA Archer and Camms.Risk.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.