Compare IBM Platform Computing LSF vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Platform Computing LSF? Share your opinion.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The functionality is included in Windows Server licences.

More Windows Server Failover Clustering Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the ability to easily create clusters supporting geo-redundancy.
Top Answer: Unlike twenty years ago, the setup of a failover cluster is a straightforward process which can be automated easily. The functionality is included in Windows Server licences.
Top Answer: The standard, non-enterprise technical support could be improved.
Ranking
Views
102
Comparisons
45
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
1,030
Comparisons
774
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
635
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
Platform Computing LSF
Learn
IBM
Microsoft
Overview
IBM Platform LSF is a powerful workload management platform for demanding, distributed HPC environments. It provides a comprehensive set of intelligent, policy-driven scheduling features that enable you to utilize all of your compute infrastructure resources and ensure optimal application performance.Windows Server Failover Clustering provides infrastructure features that support the high-availability and disaster recovery scenarios of hosted server applications such as Microsoft SQL Server and Microsoft Exchange. If a cluster node or service fails, the services that were hosted on that node can be automatically or manually transferred to another available node in a process known as failover.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Platform Computing LSF
Learn more about Windows Server Failover Clustering
Sample Customers
Cypress Semiconductor, Platform RTM, HPC, Genomic, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, A*STARKarl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland
IBM Platform Computing LSF is ranked 8th in High Availability Clustering while Windows Server Failover Clustering is ranked 1st in High Availability Clustering with 2 reviews. IBM Platform Computing LSF is rated 0.0, while Windows Server Failover Clustering is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Server Failover Clustering writes "Good reliability and scalability, however the licensing is confusing". IBM Platform Computing LSF is most compared with DRBD, whereas Windows Server Failover Clustering is most compared with Veritas InfoScale Availability, DRBD, HPE Serviceguard and IBM PowerHA System Mirror.

See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.

We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.