Compare IBM Platform Computing LSF vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The functionality is included in Windows Server licences."

More Windows Server Failover Clustering Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The licensing is kind of convoluted. We have to pay licensing costs twice. Once because we're a software as a service (SaaS) company where people access our servers. I have to get the service provider… more »
Top Answer: The solution has failed me maybe twice since I've had it over the course of ten years. The failure was a long time ago, however, and it happened on a different version. RIght now, the current version… more »
Ranking
Views
97
Comparisons
34
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,397
Comparisons
769
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
635
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Platform Computing LSF
Learn More
Overview
IBM Platform LSF is a powerful workload management platform for demanding, distributed HPC environments. It provides a comprehensive set of intelligent, policy-driven scheduling features that enable you to utilize all of your compute infrastructure resources and ensure optimal application performance.
Windows Server Failover Clustering provides infrastructure features that support the high-availability and disaster recovery scenarios of hosted server applications such as Microsoft SQL Server and Microsoft Exchange. If a cluster node or service fails, the services that were hosted on that node can be automatically or manually transferred to another available node in a process known as failover.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Platform Computing LSF
Learn more about Windows Server Failover Clustering
Sample Customers
Cypress Semiconductor, Platform RTM, HPC, Genomic, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, A*STAR
Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider24%
Manufacturing Company10%
Financial Services Firm5%

IBM Platform Computing LSF is ranked 8th in High Availability Clustering while Windows Server Failover Clustering is ranked 1st in High Availability Clustering with 2 reviews. IBM Platform Computing LSF is rated 0.0, while Windows Server Failover Clustering is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Server Failover Clustering writes "Good reliability and scalability, however the licensing is confusing". IBM Platform Computing LSF is most compared with , whereas Windows Server Failover Clustering is most compared with Veritas InfoScale Availability, DRBD, HPE Serviceguard and IBM PowerHA System Mirror.

See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.

We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.